Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upstream merge 2024 08 12 #1761

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

torben-hansen
Copy link
Contributor

MERGE COMMIT

From 5507ccd to 7cb8df5.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and the ISC license.

@torben-hansen torben-hansen requested a review from a team as a code owner August 13, 2024 13:41
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.45%. Comparing base (f350674) to head (5b54965).

Files Patch % Lines
crypto/des/des.c 66.66% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1761   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.44%   78.45%           
=======================================
  Files         580      580           
  Lines       96780    96780           
  Branches    13863    13862    -1     
=======================================
+ Hits        75921    75927    +6     
+ Misses      20241    20236    -5     
+ Partials      618      617    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

davidben and others added 5 commits August 13, 2024 07:36
Also some minor fixes from running doc.go over x509.h.

Bug: 426
Change-Id: I8d4cf0cc2161aa7ab8ff9461b6d99daa9d9360c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65211
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 91b7df2aff7d842fa305dd9e3ebee68f9b357e7c)
Goldmont, the successor to Silvermont in the Atom line, added XSAVE, so
these "MOVBE without XSAVE" code paths are strictly for Silvermont. The
code paths will still work on Silvermont but with reduced performance.

Change-Id: I57f530f487e0f9b6b3f6aac912dbfaaa46628b9f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/64788
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 77ee4e4609cfb3480e1a554790348ebcab61313e)
Per the header, these symbols were private and only exported for
decrepit. But decrepit can include internal headers.

Change-Id: I1155f4b98252004b80a53efb0a6009400a6c59ac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65687
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 7f45053d42ae0b5f4d5d96fa471d671c6d1462e9)
These macros are unnamespaced and only used in one file. Keep their
definitions more local. Also remove the #undefs at the end of des.c.
They date to when des.c was part of bcm.c, but it isn't anymore.

Change-Id: I6306929929f2304b93c3fdb2e787965c40729d6a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65688
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit cba7adcd108e9a41a992b4c4fc18b050e4d05a66)
@torben-hansen torben-hansen force-pushed the upstream-merge-2024-08-12 branch from 7159082 to e349f33 Compare August 13, 2024 14:36
Copy link
Contributor

@smittals2 smittals2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a blocking comment but should the two later commits to fix the CI and generate files be part of the commit history for the upstream merge? Or should those changes have been done as a part of the relevant upstream commits? Asking for my knowledge as well :)

@torben-hansen torben-hansen merged commit ecaf41a into aws:main Aug 16, 2024
104 of 106 checks passed
@torben-hansen torben-hansen deleted the upstream-merge-2024-08-12 branch August 16, 2024 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants