Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(apigateway): relax access log format check to allow either requestId or extendedRequestId #22591

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 21, 2022

Conversation

kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc commented Oct 20, 2022

APIGW's recommendation is either:

  • Use $context.extendedRequestId only
  • Use $context.requestId AND $context.extendedRequestId

In fact, API Gateway ControlPlane requires either $context.requestId and $context.extendedRequestId.

CDK is following suit with requiring either one, not just requestId.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Oct 20, 2022

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team October 20, 2022 21:13
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Oct 20, 2022
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Oct 20, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

@kaizencc kaizencc changed the title fix(apigateway): relax access log format to allow either requestId or extendedRequestId fix(apigateway): relax access log format check to allow either requestId or extendedRequestId Oct 21, 2022
@kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Changes to synth-time checks only

@kaizencc kaizencc added the pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes label Oct 21, 2022
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review October 21, 2022 13:09

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dissmissing previous PRLinter review.

Copy link
Contributor

@corymhall corymhall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 21, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 63214cd
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 1a16ad0 into main Oct 21, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the conroy/apigw branch October 21, 2022 16:22
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 21, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

mrgrain pushed a commit to mrgrain/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2022
…tId or extendedRequestId (aws#22591)

APIGW's recommendation is either:

- Use `$context.extendedRequestId` only
- Use `$context.requestId` AND `$context.extendedRequestId`

In fact, API Gateway ControlPlane requires either `$context.requestId` and `$context.extendedRequestId`.

CDK is following suit with requiring either one, not just `requestId`.

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2 pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants