Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(compendium): add latest issues #59

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

salmad3
Copy link
Contributor

@salmad3 salmad3 commented Dec 4, 2023

Context:

  • Adds latest issues up until #"50" (the " are placed to intentionally not tag the issue.)
  • Does not incorporate new issues that are meant for the upcoming FAQ.

We can likely add some automation to update this document.

@salmad3 salmad3 requested a review from jaekwon as a code owner December 4, 2023 22:31
@jaekwon
Copy link
Contributor

jaekwon commented Dec 4, 2023

It's interesting to use AI to summarize, but I still hesitate to officially support any AI tooling for the purpose of AtomOne. That crosses a line for me. You can use AI if you must but I'd say every AI-based commit should still be reviewed by the committer. In this way, the committer is ultimately responsible for what gets put in and there is no confusion.

But AtomOne itself can have a pro-AI (or anti-AI) partyhub!

Related: #39. As of this moment, 11 are in favor of less AI integration, 3 are in favor of more, not that these votes matter too much (they can be gamed).

If you create a bot where the AI generated summaries are displayed, in a fork or external resource, then I'm not opposed to linking it to use as a reference. Anything outside the repo is outside of "core genesis" I suppose.

@jaekwon
Copy link
Contributor

jaekwon commented Dec 4, 2023

For now I will merge your updates, and you can be the sole CODEOWNER of this file. Whether or not you use AI, it would imply that you are vetting the contents of the summaries. And over time we can figure out what to do... probably give a lot period of time for people to make any corrections, and then memorialize the summary. Does that work?

I like the idea that we can have periodic PRs to update the compendium and it gives all of us a chance to "review the news" so to speak.

@salmad3
Copy link
Contributor Author

salmad3 commented Dec 5, 2023

This sounds good and works.

@salmad3 salmad3 marked this pull request as draft December 7, 2023 00:15
@jaekwon jaekwon mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2023
@salmad3
Copy link
Contributor Author

salmad3 commented Dec 8, 2023

Will just use this PR to add the latest updates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants