Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[red-knot] Improve Type::is_disjoint_from() for KnownInstanceTypes #15261

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 5, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 25 additions & 7 deletions crates/red_knot_python_semantic/src/types.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1194,19 +1194,22 @@ impl<'db> Type<'db> {
ty.bool(db).is_always_true()
}

(Type::SubclassOf(_), _) | (_, Type::SubclassOf(_)) => {
// TODO: Once we have support for final classes, we can determine disjointness in some cases
(Type::SubclassOf(_), other) | (other, Type::SubclassOf(_)) => {
// TODO: Once we have support for final classes, we can determine disjointness in more cases
// here. However, note that it might be better to turn `Type::SubclassOf('FinalClass')` into
// `Type::ClassLiteral('FinalClass')` during construction, instead of adding special cases for
// final classes inside `Type::SubclassOf` everywhere.
false
other.is_disjoint_from(db, KnownClass::Type.to_instance(db))
}

(Type::KnownInstance(left), right) => {
left.instance_fallback(db).is_disjoint_from(db, right)
(Type::KnownInstance(known_instance), Type::Instance(InstanceType { class }))
| (Type::Instance(InstanceType { class }), Type::KnownInstance(known_instance)) => {
!known_instance.is_instance_of(db, class)
}
(left, Type::KnownInstance(right)) => {
left.is_disjoint_from(db, right.instance_fallback(db))

(known_instance_ty @ Type::KnownInstance(_), Type::Tuple(_))
| (Type::Tuple(_), known_instance_ty @ Type::KnownInstance(_)) => {
known_instance_ty.is_disjoint_from(db, KnownClass::Tuple.to_instance(db))
}

(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2352,6 +2355,15 @@ impl<'db> KnownClass {
.unwrap_or(Type::subclass_of_base(ClassBase::Unknown))
}

/// Return `true` if this symbol can be resolved to a class definition `class` in typeshed,
/// *and* `class` is a subclass of `other`.
pub fn is_subclass_of(self, db: &'db dyn Db, other: Class<'db>) -> bool {
known_module_symbol(db, self.canonical_module(db), self.as_str())
.ignore_possibly_unbound()
.and_then(Type::into_class_literal)
.is_some_and(|ClassLiteralType { class }| class.is_subclass_of(db, other))
}

/// Return the module in which we should look up the definition for this class
pub(crate) fn canonical_module(self, db: &'db dyn Db) -> KnownModule {
match self {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2738,6 +2750,10 @@ impl<'db> KnownInstanceType<'db> {
self.class().to_instance(db)
}

pub fn is_instance_of(self, db: &'db dyn Db, class: Class<'db>) -> bool {
self.class().is_subclass_of(db, class)
}

pub fn try_from_file_and_name(db: &'db dyn Db, file: File, symbol_name: &str) -> Option<Self> {
let candidate = match symbol_name {
"Any" => Self::Any,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4160,6 +4176,8 @@ pub(crate) mod tests {
#[test_case(Ty::SubclassOfBuiltinClass("object"), Ty::None)]
#[test_case(Ty::SubclassOfBuiltinClass("str"), Ty::LiteralString)]
#[test_case(Ty::AlwaysFalsy, Ty::AlwaysTruthy)]
#[test_case(Ty::Tuple(vec![]), Ty::TypingLiteral)]
#[test_case(Ty::TypingLiteral, Ty::SubclassOfBuiltinClass("object"))]
fn is_disjoint_from(a: Ty, b: Ty) {
let db = setup_db();
let a = a.into_type(&db);
Expand Down
Loading