Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rename plot_pava and minor fixes #140

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

rename plot_pava and minor fixes #140

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

aloctavodia
Copy link
Contributor

@aloctavodia aloctavodia commented Feb 19, 2025

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 18.18182% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.03%. Comparing base (9ef8965) to head (1a4e7e8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/arviz_plots/plots/pavacalibrationplot.py 14.28% 6 Missing ⚠️
src/arviz_plots/backend/bokeh/__init__.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/arviz_plots/backend/matplotlib/__init__.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/arviz_plots/backend/plotly/__init__.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #140      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.07%   79.03%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        3360     3367       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         2657     2661       +4     
- Misses        703      706       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aloctavodia aloctavodia merged commit 3bd0288 into main Feb 19, 2025
4 checks passed
@aloctavodia aloctavodia deleted the plot_pava branch February 19, 2025 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants