Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Arrow Fx docs editorial review #1290

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2019
Merged

Arrow Fx docs editorial review #1290

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2019

Conversation

MaureenElsberry
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaureenElsberry MaureenElsberry commented Feb 6, 2019

Small edits for the Arrow Fx, async, and polymorphism readmes

pakoito and others added 2 commits February 6, 2019 10:15
# Conflicts:
#	modules/docs/arrow-docs/docs/docs/effects/fx/README.md
#	modules/docs/arrow-docs/docs/docs/effects/fx/async/README.md
#	modules/docs/arrow-docs/docs/docs/effects/fx/polymorphism/README.md
Copy link
Member

@raulraja raulraja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MaureenElsberry This is awesome as usual and I'm very thankful and happy to have your help with these reviews 😘

@raulraja raulraja merged commit bb15b5e into master Feb 10, 2019
@raulraja raulraja deleted the mre-doc-edits branch February 10, 2019 12:59
@raulraja raulraja changed the title Mre doc edits Arrow Fx docs editorial review Feb 10, 2019
@pakoito
Copy link
Member

pakoito commented Feb 10, 2019

I had fixed a bunch of links already on master, this diff has smashed over them 🙈

For example,

[`parMapN`](#-parmapn-)

is a regression.

@raulraja
Copy link
Member

Let's get rid of those TOC at the top. They are a burden to maintain unless we automate it and then they would not be there in the first place.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants