Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cm3588-nas + nanopi-r6c/r6s: recover vendor u-boot, not used #7676

Conversation

rpardini
Copy link
Member

@rpardini rpardini commented Jan 8, 2025

cm3588-nas + nanopi-r6c/r6s: recover vendor u-boot, not used

  • cm3588-nas: recover vendor u-boot
    • who doesn't love some 2017?
    • with working UMS/OTG/Gadget for UMS and RockUSB
    • does not change board file, thus is absolutely not used anywhere
  • nanopi-r6c/r6s: recover vendor u-boot
    • the vendor uboot stuff was already in, by Efe a few months ago; doesn't have nvme
    • update defconfig to drop optee stuff so it works again
    • does not change board file, thus is absolutely not used anywhere

- who doesn't love some 2017?
- with working UMS/OTG/Gadget for UMS and RockUSB
- does not change board file, thus is absolutely not used anywhere
- the vendor uboot stuff was already in, by Efe a few months ago; doesn't have nvme
- update defconfig to drop optee stuff so it works again
- does not change board file, thus is absolutely not used anywhere
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/large PR with 250 lines or more Needs review Seeking for review Hardware Hardware related like kernel, U-Boot, ... Patches Patches related to kernel, U-Boot, ... labels Jan 8, 2025
@rpardini
Copy link
Member Author

rpardini commented Jan 8, 2025

sometimes, one needs the vendor u-boot to track down some crap to fix mainline. since I spent time reviving those, here's a PR.

@rpardini rpardini marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 00:49
@rpardini rpardini requested a review from igorpecovnik as a code owner January 8, 2025 00:49
@rpardini
Copy link
Member Author

rpardini commented Jan 8, 2025

of course lets not merge this

@rpardini rpardini closed this Jan 8, 2025
@Tonymac32
Copy link
Member

MERGING RFN 🤣

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Hardware Hardware related like kernel, U-Boot, ... Needs review Seeking for review Patches Patches related to kernel, U-Boot, ... size/large PR with 250 lines or more
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants