Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @pulumi/pulumi to v3.149.0 #2035

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 8, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@pulumi/pulumi (source) 3.148.0 -> 3.149.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pulumi/pulumi (@​pulumi/pulumi)

v3.149.0

Compare Source

Features
  • [cli] Update pulumi-java to 1.2.0

  • [cli/display] Always print resource summaries in preview, even after errors
    #​18465

  • [cli/plugin] Improve the warning when using plugins from PATH
    #​18476

  • [engine] Deployments continue past delete errors due to protect
    #​18396

  • [sdk/python] [Experimental/Components] Add infrastructure to bootstrap providers from component resources
    #​18403
    #​18401

  • [sdk/python] [Experimental/Components] Analyze ComponentResource properties
    #​18403

  • [sdk/python] [Experimental/Components] Infer ComplexTypes for ComponentResources
    #​18405

  • [sdk/python] [Experimental/Components] Handle complex types in inputs and outputs
    #​18419

  • [sdk/python] [Experimental/Components] Support array types in component schema inference
    #​18469

  • [sdk/python] [Experimental/Components] Support dict types in component schema inference
    #​18472

Bug Fixes
  • [engine] Filter __internal keys when calling providers DiffConfig
    #​18440

  • [engine] The engine will correctly use old state for provider config with no reported differences
    #​18411

  • [cli/config] Fix setting indexed top-level config keys
    #​18444

  • [cli/import] Fix the declaration of parameterized providers in import JSON files
    #​18450

  • [sdk/go] Provide a better error message when a Go program can't be run
    #​18383

  • [cli/package] Allow https:// prefixes for Git repository URLs
    #​18380

  • [cli/package] Fix package add and code generation when package name contains dashes in Go
    #​18457

  • [sdk/python] [Experimental/Components] Handle inputs and outputs
    #​18408


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Feb 8, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

@benchmarks/node-fetch results (noConsumeBody)

   ✓ active_handles.................: avg=140.653499 min=12     med=141     max=176     p(90)=159     p(95)=163    
     data_received..................: 21 MB  703 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 14 MB  456 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=2.15µs     min=641ns  med=1.33µs  max=4.19ms  p(90)=2µs     p(95)=2.26µs 
     http_req_connecting............: avg=344ns      min=0s     med=0s      max=2.57ms  p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s     
     http_req_duration..............: avg=21.67ms    min=3.17ms med=21.14ms max=1.14s   p(90)=27.29ms p(95)=28.63ms
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=21.67ms    min=3.17ms med=21.14ms max=1.14s   p(90)=27.29ms p(95)=28.63ms
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%  ✓ 0           ✗ 137970
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=32.54µs    min=9.2µs  med=22.95µs max=13.66ms p(90)=37.35µs p(95)=44.39µs
     http_req_sending...............: avg=10.5µs     min=3.2µs  med=6.38µs  max=6.5ms   p(90)=9.73µs  p(95)=13.56µs
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s         min=0s     med=0s      max=0s      p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s     
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=21.63ms    min=3.11ms med=21.11ms max=1.14s   p(90)=27.25ms p(95)=28.57ms
     http_reqs......................: 137970 4598.056186/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=43.45ms    min=9.95ms med=41.91ms max=1.17s   p(90)=47.56ms p(95)=53.22ms
     iterations.....................: 68955  2298.028298/s
     vus............................: 100    min=100       max=100 
     vus_max........................: 100    min=100       max=100 

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

@benchmarks/node-fetch results (consumeBody)

   ✓ active_handles.................: avg=140.323424 min=28      med=141     max=184     p(90)=161     p(95)=166    
     data_received..................: 21 MB  686 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 13 MB  440 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=3.57µs     min=622ns   med=1.14µs  max=16.48ms p(90)=1.97µs  p(95)=2.16µs 
     http_req_connecting............: avg=1.59µs     min=0s      med=0s      max=5.39ms  p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s     
     http_req_duration..............: avg=22.22ms    min=6.73ms  med=21.61ms max=1.17s   p(90)=27.92ms p(95)=29.38ms
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=22.22ms    min=6.73ms  med=21.61ms max=1.17s   p(90)=27.92ms p(95)=29.38ms
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%  ✓ 0           ✗ 134602
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=31.9µs     min=9.2µs   med=22.23µs max=18.02ms p(90)=35.62µs p(95)=42.13µs
     http_req_sending...............: avg=10.64µs    min=3.14µs  med=5.28µs  max=23.23ms p(90)=9.04µs  p(95)=12.19µs
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s         min=0s      med=0s      max=0s      p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s     
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=22.18ms    min=6.68ms  med=21.57ms max=1.17s   p(90)=27.88ms p(95)=29.33ms
     http_reqs......................: 134602 4485.951894/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=44.54ms    min=21.24ms med=42.89ms max=1.2s    p(90)=47.4ms  p(95)=55.39ms
     iterations.....................: 67274  2242.076104/s
     vus............................: 100    min=100       max=100 
     vus_max........................: 100    min=100       max=100 

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

@benchmarks/server results (undici)

     ✓ no-errors
     ✓ expected-result

   ✓ checks.........................: 100.00% ✓ 196418      ✗ 0    
     data_received..................: 20 MB   658 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 7.9 MB  262 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=1.39µs   min=872ns    med=1.17µs   max=584.12µs p(90)=1.89µs   p(95)=2.06µs  
     http_req_connecting............: avg=5ns      min=0s       med=0s       max=526.76µs p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration..............: avg=241.92µs min=179.39µs med=228.27µs max=35.71ms  p(90)=257.55µs p(95)=269.55µs
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=241.92µs min=179.39µs med=228.27µs max=35.71ms  p(90)=257.55µs p(95)=269.55µs
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%   ✓ 0           ✗ 98209
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=25.43µs  min=13.6µs   med=23.42µs  max=2.45ms   p(90)=30.91µs  p(95)=33.74µs 
     http_req_sending...............: avg=6.37µs   min=4.01µs   med=5.57µs   max=253.75µs p(90)=8.15µs   p(95)=8.82µs  
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=210.12µs min=159.34µs med=196.35µs max=35.64ms  p(90)=222.57µs p(95)=233.12µs
     http_reqs......................: 98209   3273.459481/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=300.94µs min=223.01µs med=286.22µs max=35.83ms  p(90)=318.9µs  p(95)=333.74µs
     iterations.....................: 98209   3273.459481/s
     vus............................: 1       min=1         max=1  
     vus_max........................: 1       min=1         max=1  

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

@benchmarks/server results (ponyfill)

     ✓ no-errors
     ✓ expected-result

   ✓ checks.........................: 100.00% ✓ 298166     ✗ 0     
     data_received..................: 29 MB   979 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 12 MB   398 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=1.38µs   min=892ns    med=1.18µs   max=277.82µs p(90)=1.85µs   p(95)=2.01µs  
     http_req_connecting............: avg=0ns      min=0s       med=0s       max=121.72µs p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration..............: avg=139.05µs min=95.36µs  med=134.83µs max=5.91ms   p(90)=156.87µs p(95)=163.51µs
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=139.05µs min=95.36µs  med=134.83µs max=5.91ms   p(90)=156.87µs p(95)=163.51µs
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%   ✓ 0          ✗ 149083
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=24.2µs   min=11.27µs  med=22.7µs   max=2.67ms   p(90)=29.97µs  p(95)=32.52µs 
     http_req_sending...............: avg=6.21µs   min=4µs      med=5.37µs   max=563.42µs p(90)=8µs      p(95)=8.57µs  
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=108.63µs min=68.66µs  med=104.06µs max=5.81ms   p(90)=122.99µs p(95)=128.58µs
     http_reqs......................: 149083  4969.26369/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=196.77µs min=139.28µs med=191.85µs max=5.99ms   p(90)=216.97µs p(95)=225.74µs
     iterations.....................: 149083  4969.26369/s
     vus............................: 1       min=1        max=1   
     vus_max........................: 1       min=1        max=1   

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

@benchmarks/server results (native)

     ✓ no-errors
     ✓ expected-result

   ✓ checks.........................: 100.00% ✓ 207530      ✗ 0     
     data_received..................: 21 MB   695 kB/s
     data_sent......................: 8.3 MB  277 kB/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=1.46µs   min=912ns    med=1.24µs   max=321.72µs p(90)=1.94µs   p(95)=2.12µs  
     http_req_connecting............: avg=1ns      min=0s       med=0s       max=116.99µs p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration..............: avg=224.9µs  min=169.05µs med=214.23µs max=10.72ms  p(90)=241.38µs p(95)=251.71µs
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=224.9µs  min=169.05µs med=214.23µs max=10.72ms  p(90)=241.38µs p(95)=251.71µs
     http_req_failed................: 0.00%   ✓ 0           ✗ 103765
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=25.78µs  min=13.76µs  med=24.1µs   max=2.47ms   p(90)=31.26µs  p(95)=33.99µs 
     http_req_sending...............: avg=6.65µs   min=4.2µs    med=5.87µs   max=1.54ms   p(90)=8.33µs   p(95)=9.19µs  
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=192.46µs min=143.83µs med=182.03µs max=10.65ms  p(90)=206.05µs p(95)=215.72µs
     http_reqs......................: 103765  3458.717963/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=284.54µs min=212.57µs med=272.87µs max=10.86ms  p(90)=303.7µs  p(95)=317.26µs
     iterations.....................: 103765  3458.717963/s
     vus............................: 1       min=1         max=1   
     vus_max........................: 1       min=1         max=1   

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pulumi-pulumi-3.x branch from b9b5efe to 152183d Compare February 8, 2025 12:36
@ardatan ardatan merged commit 0aa354b into master Feb 8, 2025
25 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/pulumi-pulumi-3.x branch February 8, 2025 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant