Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: CI test analysis for analytics flaky spec #38062

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator

@NandanAnantharamu NandanAnantharamu commented Dec 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated test specification path to focus on "Analytics" features instead of "Fork Template" functionality in the testing environment.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updating the limited-tests.txt file within the Cypress testing framework. The modification specifically alters the path of a test specification file from Fork_Template_spec.js to Analytics_spec.js, indicating a transition in testing focus from the "Fork Template" functionality to "Analytics" features. The overall structure and comments in the file remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt Updated test specification path from Fork_Template_spec.js to Analytics_spec.js.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Bug, ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • ApekshaBhosale
  • sagar-qa007

🎉 In the land of code where tests reside,
A shift in focus, we take with pride.
From Forks to Analytics, the path is clear,
With Cypress we test, our goals are near!
Let's run those specs, let the results unfold,
In the world of testing, new stories told! 📊


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59833b0 and 17075b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)

Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (2)

Line range hint 1-6: LGTM! The change aligns with PR objectives

The modification to focus on Analytics_spec.js aligns with the PR's goal of analyzing flaky analytics tests. The file structure and comments remain clear and informative.


2-2: Verify the Analytics spec file exists

Let's ensure the Analytics spec file exists and is properly located.

✅ Verification successful

Analytics spec file exists and contains valid test structure

The file exists at the correct location and contains proper Cypress test specifications for analytics telemetry verification.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of Analytics_spec.js and check its content
# Expected: File should exist and contain Cypress test specifications

# Check if the file exists
fd "Analytics_spec.js" app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/OtherUIFeatures/

# If file exists, check its content for test structure
rg -A 5 "describe|it\(" app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/OtherUIFeatures/Analytics_spec.js

Length of output: 2294


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=10

@github-actions github-actions bot added skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Test labels Dec 9, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12240363270.
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!
All Cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 30 Total Passed: 3 Total Failed: 9 Total Skipped: 18 *****************************

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

Copy link

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

11 similar comments
@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 18, 2024
Copy link

This PR has been closed because of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Stale Test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant