chore: Adding the GraphQLEditorForm for the modularised flow #36633
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the plugin action editor, notably by enhancing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 2, when compared with the release branch. Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/QueryEditor.tsx (2)
21-24: Well done on simplifying the QueryHeader, class!I'm pleased to see you've refactored the QueryHeader to use the Text component. This is a step in the right direction for maintaining consistency with our design system. However, let's take this opportunity to make our code even more readable and maintainable.
Consider extracting the background color into a separate variable for better maintainability. Here's a little homework for you:
+const QUERY_HEADER_BG = "var(--ads-v2-color-bg-subtle)"; const QueryHeader = styled(Text)` - background: var(--ads-v2-color-bg-subtle); + background: ${QUERY_HEADER_BG}; padding: 8px 16px; `;This way, if we need to change the background color in the future, we only need to update it in one place. Remember, clean code is happy code!
52-54: Excellent work on streamlining the QueryHeader, students!Your refactoring of the QueryHeader usage is commendable. Moving the color and type props to the styled component shows a good understanding of styled-components. However, let's ensure we're consistent with our use of design tokens.
For consistency with our design system, let's use our text type constants. Here's a little exercise for you:
+import { TextType } from "@appsmith/design-system"; - <QueryHeader color={"var(--ads-v2-color-fg)"} type={TextType.H6}> + <QueryHeader color={"var(--ads-v2-color-fg)"} type={TextType.HEADING6}> Query </QueryHeader>Remember, consistency is key in creating a cohesive user interface. Keep up the good work!
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/CommonEditorForm/hooks/useGetFormActionValues.ts (1)
Line range hint
77-83: Excellent work on completing our recipe, class!You've successfully added our new ingredient,
actionConfigurationBody, to the final mix. This ensures that our action values cake will have all the necessary flavors.However, let's consider a small improvement for consistency:
return { - actionConfigurationBody, actionHeaders, autoGeneratedHeaders, actionParams, datasourceHeaders, datasourceParams, + actionConfigurationBody, };By moving
actionConfigurationBodyto the end, we maintain the same order as in our default return object. Remember, in programming as in cookbook writing, consistent ordering makes our recipes easier to read and follow!app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/VariableEditor.tsx (1)
27-30: Class, let's examine the transformation of ourVariableHeadercomponent.Dear students, observe how we've evolved our
VariableHeaderfrom a simpledivto a more sophisticatedTextcomponent. This change is like upgrading from a basic notepad to a smart tablet - it gives us more features to work with!However, we must ensure we're using these new capabilities to their fullest. Consider the following homework assignment:
- Explore the
Textcomponent's properties. Are there any we could utilize to enhance our header's appearance or functionality?- Think about accessibility. Does this change improve screen reader compatibility?
- Consider adding a
data-testidattribute to make our component easier to select in automated tests.Remember, in coding as in life, with great power comes great responsibility. Let's make sure we're using our new
Textcomponent wisely!app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/RestAPIForm.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-26: Well done, class! Let's review the changes at the top of our file.I'm pleased to see you've tidied up our imports and introduced a new constant. This is a step in the right direction for maintaining a clean and organized codebase.
However, I have a small suggestion to make this even better:
Consider moving the
FORM_NAMEconstant to a separate constants file if it's used across multiple components. This would further improve our code organization. If you agree, you can apply the following change:-const FORM_NAME = API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME; +import { FORM_NAME } from "../constants/formConstants";Don't forget to create the
formConstants.tsfile if it doesn't exist yet!
Line range hint
51-107: Let's examine the changes to our Redux connection, class.I'm impressed with the simplification you've achieved here. By removing the
mapDispatchToPropsfunction and streamlining the props we're pulling from the state, you've made this component more focused and easier to understand. This is an excellent example of the principle of "less is more" in action!However, I have a small suggestion that could make this even better:
Consider breaking down this large
connectfunction into smaller, more manageable pieces. You could create separate selector functions for different groups of related data. For example:const selectApiFormData = (state: AppState) => ({ httpMethodFromForm: selector(state, "actionConfiguration.httpMethod"), actionConfigurationHeaders: selector(state, "actionConfiguration.headers") || [], // ... other form-related selectors }); const selectDatasourceData = (state: AppState) => { const datasourceFromAction = selector(state, "datasource"); // ... logic to find datasource return { datasourceHeaders: get(datasourceFromAction, `datasourceStorages.${currentEnvironment}.datasourceConfiguration.headers`) || [], datasourceParams: get(datasourceFromAction, `datasourceStorages.${currentEnvironment}.datasourceConfiguration.queryParameters`) || [], }; }; // Then in your connect function: export default connect((state: AppState) => ({ ...selectApiFormData(state), ...selectDatasourceData(state), // ... other selectors }))( reduxForm<Action, APIFormProps>({ form: FORM_NAME, enableReinitialize: true, })(ApiEditorForm), );This approach would make the code more modular and easier to test. What do you think about this suggestion?
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/PostBodyData.tsx (2)
85-85: Remove extra whitespace in 'className' attributeAttention to detail is essential. There's an extra space in the
classNameattribute. Let's remove it to keep the code clean.Apply this diff:
-className={`w-2 h-full -ml-2 group cursor-ew-resize ${tailwindLayers.resizer}`} +className={`w-2 h-full -ml-2 group cursor-ew-resize ${tailwindLayers.resizer}`}
90-93: Simplify 'className' assignment in 'ResizerHandler'Since the classes are static, we can simplify the
classNameprop by directly using a string. This reduces complexity and enhances readability.Apply this diff:
-<ResizerHandler - className={classNames({ - "transform transition": true, - })} +<ResizerHandler + className="transform transition" resizing={resizing} />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/PluginActionForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/CommonEditorForm/CommonEditorForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/CommonEditorForm/hooks/useGetFormActionValues.ts (3 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/api/PluginApi.ts (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/ApiEditorContext.tsx (0 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/CommonEditorForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (4 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/PostBodyData.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/QueryEditor.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/VariableEditor.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/RestAPIForm.tsx (5 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/EditorJSONtoForm.tsx (3 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryEditorContext.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/ApiEditorContext.tsx
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryEditorContext.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (28)
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/PluginActionForm.tsx (2)
7-7: Well done, class! Let's examine this new import statement.Good job adding the import for the
GraphQLEditorFormcomponent. This new addition will allow us to use the GraphQL editor in our form. Remember, children, it's important to keep our imports organized and placed at the top of the file.
15-20: Excellent work on updating our component rendering, class!Let's break down these changes:
We've simplified the rendering of
APIEditorFormusing the logical AND (&&) operator. This is a more concise way to conditionally render components in React.We've added a new condition to render our
GraphQLEditorFormwhen theplugin.uiComponentis of typeUIComponentTypes.GraphQLEditorForm.These changes allow our
PluginActionFormto support both API and GraphQL editor forms. Remember, students, it's crucial to keep our code flexible and extensible!Can anyone tell me why we might want to support different types of editor forms in our plugin action? Think about the various types of data sources we might need to interact with!
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/CommonEditorForm/CommonEditorForm.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-58: Class dismissed, but remember your homework!Excellent work on this file, students! The main change we've seen is the export of our
Propsinterface, which is a valuable addition to our shared knowledge base. The rest of ourCommonEditorFormcomponent remains unchanged, continuing to provide a solid foundation for our plugin action editor.For your homework, I'd like you to:
- Consider if any other interfaces in this file could benefit from being exported.
- Review the component's logic to see if we can further improve its readability or performance.
- Think about how we might enhance the documentation for this component to help future students understand its purpose and usage better.
Remember, in the world of coding, there's always room for improvement! Keep up the great work, and I look forward to seeing your progress in our next class.
Line range hint
10-17: Class, let's examine this exported interface, shall we?Well done on exporting the
Propsinterface! This change opens up new possibilities for our codebase. By making this interface available to other parts of our project, we're promoting better type consistency and reusability. It's like sharing your homework with the class - everyone benefits!However, let's not forget to update our lesson plan. We should make sure to:
- Review any files that might benefit from using this newly exported interface.
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose of each prop, especially for our new students who might join the project later.
Keep up the good work! This is a step towards a more organized and maintainable codebase.
Let's check if there are any other files that could use this interface:
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/QueryEditor.tsx (1)
Line range hint
55-63: A gold star for your attention to detail!Your subtle adjustments to the Field component props demonstrate a keen eye for code cleanliness. By separating the border and borderLess props onto their own lines, you've improved the readability of our code without changing its functionality. This is exactly the kind of thoughtful refactoring we like to see.
Remember, clear and well-formatted code is like a well-organized classroom - it makes everyone's job easier! Keep up this level of attention in your future assignments.
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/CommonEditorForm/hooks/useGetFormActionValues.ts (2)
Line range hint
23-28: Well done, class! You've added a new ingredient to our recipe.The addition of
actionConfigurationBodyto our default return object is a smart move. It ensures that even when our form isn't ready, we have a complete set of ingredients for our action values cake. Remember, in programming as in baking, it's always better to have all your ingredients prepared before you start mixing!
Line range hint
1-85: Class, let's review our cooking lesson for today!We've successfully enhanced our
useGetFormActionValuesrecipe by adding a new ingredient:actionConfigurationBody. This addition makes our action values more complete and flavorful.Here's a summary of our cooking notes:
- We added
actionConfigurationBodyto our default return object. Excellent preparation!- We had a small mix-up with our measurements when extracting
actionConfigurationBody. Remember, consistency in types is crucial!- We included
actionConfigurationBodyin our final return object. A suggestion was made to keep the order consistent with our default object for easier reading.Overall, your work has improved our recipe. With these minor adjustments, we'll have a perfectly baked action values cake! Keep up the good work, and remember: in programming as in cooking, attention to detail makes all the difference!
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/VariableEditor.tsx (1)
54-56: Let's analyze how we're using our newly upgradedVariableHeader, class!Excellent work on simplifying our code structure! By passing the
colorprop directly and removing the nestedTextcomponent, we've made our code cleaner and more efficient. It's like tidying up our desk - everything is easier to find and use now.However, let's not forget to double-check our work:
- Verify that the
colorprop is being correctly applied. Remember, sometimes what looks right on paper doesn't always work in practice!- Consider if we need any additional text-related props from the
Textcomponent. For example, would adjusting thefontSizeorfontWeightenhance our header's appearance?- Think about internationalization. Is "Query variables" a string that might need to be translated in the future?
Keep up the good work, and remember: in coding, as in the classroom, clarity and simplicity are key to success!
To ensure our changes haven't affected other parts of the codebase, let's run a quick check:
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/RestAPIForm.tsx (3)
Line range hint
27-50: Excellent work on the ApiEditorForm component!I'm glad to see you've made use of our new
FORM_NAMEconstant here. This is a perfect example of how we can improve code consistency and make our lives easier when we need to make changes in the future.The rest of the component looks good, maintaining its previous structure and functionality. Keep up the good work!
108-112: Well done on updating the reduxForm configuration!I'm pleased to see you've consistently applied the
FORM_NAMEconstant here. This kind of attention to detail is what separates good code from great code. By centralizing the form name definition, you've made it much easier for us to manage and update this value in the future if needed.Keep up this level of consistency in your work!
Line range hint
1-112: Class, let's review our overall progress on this file.You've done an excellent job simplifying and focusing this component. By removing unused imports, streamlining the Redux connection, and centralizing important constants, you've made this code more maintainable and easier to understand. These changes align well with best practices for React and Redux development.
However, remember that with great refactoring comes great responsibility!
We need to ensure that these changes haven't unintentionally affected other parts of our application. Let's do a quick check:
Please run these checks and make sure to update any affected components or tests. Remember, a thorough developer always verifies the ripple effects of their changes!
✅ Verification successful
Let's take a moment to adjust our approach and ensure we thoroughly verify the impact of the changes.
Please run these updated scripts to ensure our verification is accurate and complete. If any issues arise or further verification is needed, feel free to reach out for additional assistance!
Great work! All checks have passed successfully. The usage of
API_EDITOR_FORM_NAMEandRestAPIFormacross the codebase remains intact and without issues. No broken imports or unauthorized property accesses were detected, ensuring that the recent changes haven’t adversely impacted other components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of changes on related components # Test: Check for any remaining uses of the old API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME echo "Checking for any remaining uses of API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME:" rg "API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME" --type ts --type tsx # Test: Verify that no components are trying to access removed properties echo "Checking for any components trying to access removed properties:" rg "actionResponse|suggestedWidgets|updateDatasource" --type ts --type tsx # Test: Look for any broken imports that might have been caused by our changes echo "Checking for potentially broken imports:" rg "import.*RestAPIForm" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 608
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of changes on related components with corrected file type handling # Test: Check for any remaining uses of the old API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME echo "Checking for any remaining uses of API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME:" rg "API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test: Verify that no components are trying to access removed properties echo "Checking for any components trying to access removed properties:" rg "actionResponse|suggestedWidgets|updateDatasource" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test: Look for any broken imports that might have been caused by our changes echo "Checking for any potentially broken imports:" rg "import.*RestAPIForm" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 24322
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/EditorJSONtoForm.tsx (7)
200-201: Good job on updating the context usage and dependency array!Class, let's take a moment to appreciate the improvements made here:
The addition of
actionRightPaneAdditionSectionsandnotificationfrom the context shows that we're now using more information from our shared state. This is a good practice for keeping our component up-to-date with the latest data.The update to the
setSelectedConfigTabfunction's dependency array is crucial. By includingdispatch, we ensure that our function always uses the most recent version ofdispatch. This helps prevent potential bugs related to stale closures.Remember, students, always keep your dependencies up-to-date in your useCallback and useEffect hooks!
Also applies to: 235-240
258-260: Great addition of a notification system!Class, let's examine this new feature:
We've added a conditional rendering block for
notification. This is a smart way to display important messages to our users when needed.The use of
StyledNotificationWrappershows attention to maintaining consistent styling across our application.However, we should ensure that we're handling all types of notifications properly.
Let's run a quick check to see how notifications are being used:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify notification usage and types # Test: Search for notification usage in the codebase echo "Searching for notification usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'notification' # Test: Search for different notification types (if any) echo "Searching for potential notification types:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'notification.*type'Review the results to ensure we're consistently handling notifications across our application. If we find different types of notifications, make sure they're all accounted for in our rendering logic.
261-284: Well done on updating the tabs structure!Class, let's examine these changes:
We've updated our
Tabscomponent to useonValueChangeinstead ofonChange. This suggests an API change in our component library.The overall structure of our tabs remains similar, but with some nice refinements in the JSX. This makes our code more readable and maintainable.
These changes look good, but we should double-check our work.
Let's run a quick check to ensure we're using the latest API consistently:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Tabs component usage # Test: Search for Tabs component usage echo "Searching for Tabs component usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact '<Tabs' # Test: Search for onValueChange prop echo "Searching for onValueChange prop usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'onValueChange' # Test: Search for potentially outdated onChange prop echo "Searching for potentially outdated onChange prop:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'onChange.*Tabs'Review the results to ensure we're consistently using the new
onValueChangeprop across our application. If we find any instances of the oldonChangeprop withTabs, we should update those as well.
285-300: Excellent work on modularizing the form rendering!Class, let's examine this significant improvement:
We've introduced a new
FormRendercomponent to handle our form rendering. This is a great step towards more modular and reusable code.We're passing important data to
FormRender, includingeditorConfig,formData, andformEvaluationState. This ensures our new component has all the information it needs to render the form correctly.This refactoring will make our code more maintainable and easier to test. However, we should verify that
FormRenderis implemented correctly.Let's run a quick check on our new
FormRendercomponent:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify FormRender component implementation and usage # Test: Search for FormRender component definition echo "Searching for FormRender component definition:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'export.*FormRender' # Test: Search for FormRender component usage echo "Searching for FormRender component usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact '<FormRender' # Test: Search for props used in FormRender echo "Searching for props used in FormRender:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'FormRender.*props'Review the results to ensure that
FormRenderis properly implemented and that we're using it consistently across our application. Pay special attention to the props it accepts and how they're being used.
301-328: Good job on improving the layout of our settings and documentation!Class, let's look at these thoughtful changes:
We've kept our settings tab panel structure largely the same, which maintains consistency for our users.
We've moved the documentation link outside of the tabs. This is a smart move! It ensures that our users can always access the documentation, regardless of which tab they're viewing.
These changes will improve the usability of our interface. However, we should make sure our documentation link is accessible to all users.
Let's run a quick accessibility check on our documentation link:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify accessibility of the documentation link # Test: Search for aria labels on the documentation button echo "Searching for aria labels on the documentation button:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'DocumentationButton.*aria-label' # Test: Search for keyboard event handlers on the documentation button echo "Searching for keyboard event handlers on the documentation button:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'DocumentationButton.*onKeyDown' # Test: Search for color contrast in the button styling echo "Searching for color contrast in the button styling:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'DocumentationButton.*color'Review the results to ensure that our documentation link is fully accessible. We should have appropriate aria labels, keyboard event handlers, and sufficient color contrast. If any of these are missing, consider adding them to improve accessibility.
329-345: Excellent additions to enhance our query editing experience!Class, let's examine these exciting new features:
We've added
QueryDebuggerTabsandRunHistorycomponents. These will greatly improve our ability to debug queries and track their history.We're now using an
additionalSectionsprop in ourActionRightPane. This makes our right pane more flexible and customizable.These additions will significantly enhance the functionality of our query editor. However, we should verify that these new components are implemented correctly.
Let's run a quick check on our new components:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify implementation of new components # Test: Search for QueryDebuggerTabs component definition echo "Searching for QueryDebuggerTabs component definition:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'export.*QueryDebuggerTabs' # Test: Search for RunHistory component definition echo "Searching for RunHistory component definition:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'export.*RunHistory' # Test: Search for additionalSections usage in ActionRightPane echo "Searching for additionalSections usage in ActionRightPane:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'ActionRightPane.*additionalSections'Review the results to ensure that
QueryDebuggerTabsandRunHistoryare properly implemented and that we're usingadditionalSectionscorrectly inActionRightPane. Pay special attention to the props these components accept and how they're being used.
249-257: Excellent simplification of the component structure!Class, observe how our code has been streamlined:
The
QueryEditorHeaderis now rendered directly within theQueryFormContainer. This makes our code more readable and easier to follow.We've removed the
closeEditorLinkprop fromQueryEditorHeader. This suggests a change in how we handle closing the editor.However, we need to ensure this change doesn't break anything. Let's do a quick check!
Run the following script to verify the
QueryEditorHeaderusage:Make sure to review the results and confirm that
closeEditorLinkis not used elsewhere in the codebase where it might be needed.✅ Verification successful
Good effort on the initial verification!
It looks like there were some hiccups with the previous script. Let's refine it to ensure accurate results:
Please run this updated script to verify that
QueryEditorHeaderis used correctly and thatcloseEditorLinkis not referenced elsewhere in the codebase.
Great effort! Let's fine-tune our approach to get accurate results.
It appears that the
rgcommand isn't recognizing thetsandtsxfile types. No worries! We'll adjust our script to target TypeScript files directly by their extensions:Please execute this updated script to confirm that
QueryEditorHeaderis appropriately used and thatcloseEditorLinkisn't referenced elsewhere in the codebase.
Great job! The changes are verified and safe to proceed.
The
closeEditorLinkprop has been successfully removed and isn't used anywhere else in the codebase, ensuring that this change won't introduce any issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify QueryEditorHeader usage and ensure closeEditorLink is not used elsewhere # Test: Search for QueryEditorHeader usage echo "Searching for QueryEditorHeader usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'QueryEditorHeader' # Test: Search for closeEditorLink usage echo "Searching for closeEditorLink usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'closeEditorLink'Length of output: 805
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify QueryEditorHeader usage and ensure closeEditorLink is not used elsewhere # Test: Search for QueryEditorHeader usage echo "Searching for QueryEditorHeader usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'QueryEditorHeader' # Test: Search for closeEditorLink usage echo "Searching for closeEditorLink usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'closeEditorLink'Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify QueryEditorHeader usage and ensure closeEditorLink is not used elsewhere # Test: Search for QueryEditorHeader usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for QueryEditorHeader usage in .ts and .tsx files:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" 'QueryEditorHeader' # Test: Search for closeEditorLink usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for closeEditorLink usage in .ts and .tsx files:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" 'closeEditorLink'Length of output: 747
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (2)
18-49: Well-crafted GraphQLEditorForm componentExcellent job on structuring the
GraphQLEditorFormcomponent. You've effectively utilized React hooks and neatly integrated theCommonEditorForm. The use of feature flags and permission checks demonstrates a solid understanding of best practices. Keep up the good work!
51-53: Verify the necessity ofenableReinitialize: trueThe
enableReinitialize: trueoption inreduxFormcauses the form to reinitialize whenever the initial values change. Please confirm that this behavior is required for your form, as unnecessary reinitialization can lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior.app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (6)
17-17: Clarify Component Usage by ImportingPostBodyDataBy importing
PostBodyDatafrom"./PostBodyData", you're correctly modularizing your code, which enhances readability and maintainability. Excellent work in reusing components effectively.
25-25: Maintain Consistent Form Naming withFORM_NAMEDefining
const FORM_NAME = API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME;promotes consistency across your forms. This approach simplifies future changes to form names and makes your codebase more maintainable. Well done on following best practices.
38-38: Ensure Correct Props Passing toPostBodyDataPassing
actionNameto<PostBodyData>ensures the component has all necessary information. This is a good practice to keep your components self-contained and functional.
54-54: Optimize Selector Usage withformValueSelector(FORM_NAME)Using
formValueSelector(FORM_NAME)efficiently accesses form values. This method enhances performance by memoizing selectors, reducing unnecessary re-renders. Great job implementing this optimization.
105-107: Simplify Form Configuration inreduxFormBy specifying
form: FORM_NAMEandenableReinitialize: truein yourreduxFormconfiguration, you make your form more manageable and responsive to prop changes. This adjustment improves user experience and code clarity.
35-46: Double-Check Pagination Component PropsWhile integrating the
Paginationcomponent, ensure all required props are correctly passed. Pay special attention toactionName,formName, andpaginationTypeto guarantee proper functionality.Let's confirm that all necessary props are provided to
Pagination:app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/CommonEditorForm.tsx (1)
6-6: Excellent job on importing the necessary typesYou have correctly imported
ActionResponseandPaginationFieldfrom"api/ActionAPI", which is essential for defining your interfaces accurately in the code. This ensures type safety and clarity in yourCommonFormPropsinterface. Keep up the good work!app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/PostBodyData.tsx (1)
85-88: Verify event handler assignment for touch eventsIt's important to ensure that event handlers are correctly mapped. Currently,
onTouchEndis assigned toonMouseUp. Please verify if this is intentional. If not, consider usingonTouchEnd={onTouchEnd}.
...itor/components/PluginActionForm/components/CommonEditorForm/hooks/useGetFormActionValues.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ankitakinger
changed the title
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
github-actions
bot
added
IDE Pod
|
This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 2, when compared with the release branch. Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR. |
...ginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/CommonEditorForm/CommonEditorForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 2, when compared with the release branch. Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (3)
25-25: Excellent work on standardizing the form name, students!Your decision to use a constant
FORM_NAMEis a step in the right direction. It promotes consistency and makes future changes easier. However, let's take this opportunity for a small pop quiz:Can you think of a way to make this constant even more robust? Here's a hint: What if we wanted to prevent accidental modifications?
Consider making the constant immutable:
- const FORM_NAME = API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME; + const FORM_NAME = API_EDITOR_FORM_NAME as const;This small change ensures that
FORM_NAMEcan't be accidentally reassigned. It's like using a permanent marker instead of a pencil!
Line range hint
30-50: A gold star for simplifying the GraphQLEditorForm, class!Your refactoring has made the component cleaner and more consistent. The use of
PostBodyDataand the newFORM_NAMEconstant shows great attention to detail.Now, let's have a quick lesson on type safety. Can anyone spot an opportunity to make our code even more robust?
Here's a small improvement we can make:
- function GraphQLEditorForm(props: Props) { + function GraphQLEditorForm(props: Props): JSX.Element {By explicitly declaring the return type, we're telling TypeScript exactly what to expect. It's like clearly labeling your homework assignments!
Line range hint
54-101: Impressive work on streamlining the Redux connection, students!Your efforts to remove unnecessary variables and retain only the essential data show a great understanding of efficient state management. It's like decluttering your desk - you've kept only what's needed for your work!
Now, let's think about future-proofing. Can anyone suggest how we might make this code more maintainable in the long run?
Consider extracting the state mapping logic into a separate function:
const mapStateToProps = (state: AppState, props: { pluginId: string; match?: any }) => { // ... existing logic ... return { actionName, actionResponse, // ... other returned properties ... }; }; export default connect(mapStateToProps)( reduxForm<Action, any>({ form: FORM_NAME, enableReinitialize: true, })(GraphQLEditorForm), );This separation of concerns makes the code more readable and easier to test. It's like organizing your notes into different sections!
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/PostBodyData.tsx (3)
63-65: Specify the Type fornewWidthin CallbackWhen defining the
onVariableEditorWidthChangecallback, it's good practice to type your parameters. Explicitly typingnewWidthas a number can prevent potential bugs and improve code readability.Here's how you might adjust the code:
- const onVariableEditorWidthChange = useCallback((newWidth) => { + const onVariableEditorWidthChange = useCallback((newWidth: number) => {
67-73: Clarify the Use ofundefinedinuseHorizontalResizePassing
undefinedas an argument might work, but it's important to ensure it's intentional. If this parameter isn't needed, consider documenting why it's being passed. This clarity helps others understand your code better.
90-94: Simplify Class Assignment with Static ClassesIn your
ResizerHandler, you're using theclassNamesutility to assign classes, but since all classes are static, you can simplify your code by removing the utility and directly assigning the class string.Here's the simplified code:
- <ResizerHandler - className={classNames({ - "transform transition": true, - })} - resizing={resizing} - /> + <ResizerHandler + className="transform transition" + resizing={resizing} + />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/PluginActionForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/PostBodyData.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/PluginActionForm.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/APIEditor/GraphQL/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (1)
1-17: Well done, class! Your import statements are much tidier now.I'm pleased to see that you've removed the unused imports and added the necessary
PostBodyDataimport. This kind of housekeeping is essential for maintaining a clean and efficient codebase. Keep up the good work!app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx (3)
1-15: Well-organized import statements enhance readabilityIt's excellent to see that you've organized your import statements coherently. This practice greatly improves the readability and maintainability of the code. Keep up the good work!
18-49: Thoughtful construction of theGraphQLEditorFormcomponentThe
GraphQLEditorFormfunction component is thoughtfully constructed. You're effectively utilizing React hooks likeusePluginActionContextanduseFeatureFlag, which demonstrates a solid understanding of React's state and context management. Great job!
28-28: Verify thatuseGetFormActionValuesreturns expected valuesWhen using the
useGetFormActionValueshook, ensure it consistently returns the expectedactionConfigurationBody. This will help avoid any unintended issues whenactionConfigurationBodyis used later in your component.Consider writing tests for the hook to verify its behavior under different scenarios.
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/PostBodyData.tsx (2)
84-88: Verify the Touch Event Handler AssignmentIn your resizer component, you've assigned
onTouchEnd={onMouseUp}. While this may function correctly, it's wise to confirm that this mapping is intentional and doesn't lead to unexpected behavior on touch devices.
84-84: Double-Check the Negative Margin UsageUsing the class
-ml-2introduces a negative margin. Ensure that this doesn't cause layout issues across different screen sizes. Negative margins can sometimes lead to unexpected overflows or misalignments.
...luginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...luginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...luginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...luginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/GraphQLEditorForm.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/PostBodyData.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/GraphQLEditor/PostBodyData.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
|
||
| const PluginActionForm = () => { | ||
| useChangeActionCall(); | ||
| const { plugin } = usePluginActionContext(); | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <Flex p="spaces-2" w="100%"> | ||
| {plugin.uiComponent === UIComponentTypes.ApiEditorForm ? ( | ||
| {plugin.uiComponent === UIComponentTypes.ApiEditorForm && ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: Can this be written in object map? This way it will reduce repetition and will be easier to add more components in future.
const ComponentMap = {
[UIComponentTypes.ApiEditorForm]: APIEditorForm,
[UIComponentTypes.GraphQLEditorForm]: GraphQLEditorForm,
};
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will handle it in a separate PR to avoid re-running all the tests again.
|
/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true |
|
Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11139301918. |
|
Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-36633.dp.appsmith.com |
Description
Adding the GraphQLEditorForm for the modularised flow
Fixes #36624
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11138697528
Commit: 3aa280e
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.AllSpec:
Wed, 02 Oct 2024 07:47:13 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
GraphQLEditorFormcomponent for editing GraphQL actions within the plugin action editor.PostBodyDatacomponent for managing the layout and functionality of a GraphQL API editor, featuring aQueryEditorand aVariableEditor.useGetFormActionValueshook to includeactionConfigurationBody, ensuring a complete set of action values.Improvements
Bug Fixes
closeEditorLinkfrom multiple contexts and components to streamline functionality.