chore: removed non reactive json migration #36413
Conversation
sondermanish
requested review from
sharat87,
abhvsn and
a team
as code owners
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce enhancements to the application import service, specifically focusing on the migration of application JSON artifacts to the latest schema. A new method for migrating artifacts has been added, along with modifications to existing methods and classes to support this functionality. The changes promote a reactive programming model, improving the clarity and maintainability of the code while ensuring compatibility with the latest schema requirements. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Additional context usedLearnings (1)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
sondermanish
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
93-112: Consider updating the method call for consistency.Class, while reviewing this test, I noticed that the
migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchemamethod call hasn't been updated to include the twonullparameters, unlike the previous tests formigrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema.To maintain consistency across the test suite, I recommend updating the method call to include these parameters:
Mono<ApplicationJson> applicationJsonMono = jsonSchemaMigration.migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema(applicationJson, null, null);This will ensure that all tests are aligned with the new method signatures.
Line range hint
114-135: Update the method call to match the new signature.Class, I have one more observation regarding consistency. Similar to the previous test, the
migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchemamethod call in this test hasn't been updated to include the twonullparameters.To maintain uniformity across all tests, please update the method call as follows:
Mono<ApplicationJson> applicationJsonMono = jsonSchemaMigration.migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchema(applicationJson, null, null);Consistency in test structure and method usage is key to ensuring the overall maintainability and readability of the test suite.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/CommonGitServiceCETest.java (1)
294-296: Good work! The method logic is sound.Just one small suggestion:
Consider handling exceptions that may occur while reading the file or migrating the schema. Returning an error Mono in the catch block will make the code more robust.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigration.java (1)
Line range hint
85-161: Consider Refactoring the Migration Logic for Better MaintainabilityDear class, the extensive switch-case block within the
migrateServerSchemamethod (lines 85-161) is becoming quite lengthy and may affect readability. Refactoring each case into separate methods can make the code cleaner and easier to maintain. Breaking down complex methods is a good practice that enhances the understandability of our code.Here's how you might refactor the method:
private Mono<ApplicationJson> migrateServerSchema(ApplicationJson applicationJson, String baseApplicationId, String branchName) { if (jsonSchemaVersions.getServerVersion().equals(applicationJson.getServerSchemaVersion())) { return Mono.just(applicationJson); } switch (applicationJson.getServerSchemaVersion()) { case 0: return migrateFromVersion0(applicationJson) .flatMap(updatedJson -> migrateServerSchema(updatedJson, baseApplicationId, branchName)); // Include cases for each version default: return Mono.just(applicationJson); } } private Mono<ApplicationJson> migrateFromVersion0(ApplicationJson applicationJson) { // Migration logic for version 0 to 1 applicationJson.setServerSchemaVersion(1); return Mono.just(applicationJson); } // Similarly, create methods for other versionsThis approach modularizes each migration step, making it clearer and easier to manage future changes.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java (4 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceImpl.java (3 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/ImportServiceCEImpl.java (2 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/artifactbased/ArtifactBasedImportServiceCE.java (1 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigration.java (3 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/ce/CreateDBTablePageSolutionCEImpl.java (3 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/git/CommonGitServiceCETest.java (1 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/GitFileUtilsTest.java (1 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/ImportServiceTests.java (2 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/transactions/ImportApplicationTransactionServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceImpl.java (2)
15-15: Good job adding the import statement forJsonSchemaMigration!The import statement looks correct and indicates that the
JsonSchemaMigrationclass will be utilized in this file. Keep up the great work!
39-39: Excellent work adding theJsonSchemaMigrationparameter to the constructor!The addition of the
JsonSchemaMigrationparameter and passing it to the super constructor looks great. This change suggests that theApplicationImportServiceImplclass now requires an instance ofJsonSchemaMigrationfor its functionality.However, let's make sure to verify the usage of
ApplicationImportServiceImplacross the codebase to ensure that the new parameter is properly provided during instantiation. We can use the following script to check for any potential issues:Keep up the fantastic work, and let's ensure a smooth integration of this change!
Also applies to: 55-55
Verification successful
Alright, class! It seems our previous search didn't yield the results we expected. Let's approach this problem step by step and see if we can find where our
ApplicationImportServiceImplis hiding. Remember, in programming, as in life, persistence is key!Now, let's run these commands and see what we can learn about our elusive
ApplicationImportServiceImpl. Pay attention, class, as this is how we debug and investigate in the real world!
Excellent work, class! We've made some progress in our investigation. Let's review our findings and determine our next steps.
We've successfully located our
ApplicationImportServiceImplclass. It's right where we expected it to be, extending theApplicationImportServiceCEImplclass. However, we still need to verify a few things to ensure our code change is properly integrated.Let's focus on three key areas:
- The constructor parameters
- Usage of this class in other parts of the codebase
- The apparent lack of test coverage
Here's what we'll do next:
Now, let's run these commands and see what we can learn. Remember, class, thorough investigation is key to maintaining a robust codebase!
Alright, class, let's review what we've learned from our investigation!
Good news: The constructor change looks spot-on!
We can see that the
JsonSchemaMigrationparameter has been added to theApplicationImportServiceImplconstructor, just as we discussed in our previous lesson. This shows excellent attention to detail!However, we've uncovered a few areas that require our attention:
We couldn't find any direct usage of
ApplicationImportServiceImploutside its own file. This isn't necessarily a problem, as it might be used through dependency injection. But it's something to keep in mind.More importantly, we couldn't find any test files specifically related to
ApplicationImport. This is a bit concerning, as it might indicate a gap in our test coverage.So, what's our homework assignment?
First and foremost, pat yourself on the back for implementing the constructor change correctly!
Next, let's focus on improving our test coverage. It would be a good idea to create or update test cases for
ApplicationImportServiceImplto ensure its functionality is properly verified.Lastly, I recommend a manual review of the dependency injection configuration. This will help us confirm that
ApplicationImportServiceImplis being used correctly throughout the application.Remember, class, thorough testing and proper dependency management are crucial for maintaining a robust and reliable codebase!
Does anyone have any questions about our findings or the next steps?
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ApplicationImportServiceImpl` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the constructor usage. Expect: Occurrences with the new `JsonSchemaMigration` parameter. rg --type java -A 5 $'new ApplicationImportServiceImpl'Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate ApplicationImportServiceImpl usage and definition # Search for the class definition echo "Searching for ApplicationImportServiceImpl class definition:" rg --type java "class ApplicationImportServiceImpl" # Search for any mention of ApplicationImportServiceImpl echo -e "\nSearching for any mention of ApplicationImportServiceImpl:" rg --type java "ApplicationImportServiceImpl" # Search for possible bean definitions in Spring configuration files echo -e "\nSearching for possible bean definitions:" rg --type xml --type java "ApplicationImportService" # Search for possible usage in test files echo -e "\nSearching for usage in test files:" rg --type java "ApplicationImportService.*Test"Length of output: 1715
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further investigation of ApplicationImportServiceImpl # Check the constructor parameters echo "Checking ApplicationImportServiceImpl constructor:" rg --type java -A 10 "public ApplicationImportServiceImpl\(" app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceImpl.java # Look for usage of ApplicationImportServiceImpl echo -e "\nSearching for usage of ApplicationImportServiceImpl:" rg --type java "ApplicationImportServiceImpl" --glob !**/ApplicationImportServiceImpl.java # Search for test files related to application import echo -e "\nSearching for related test files:" rg --type java "class.*Test.*ApplicationImport"Length of output: 1195
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/artifactbased/ArtifactBasedImportServiceCE.java (1)
157-157: Excellent work on expanding the interface's capabilities! 👏The new
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonmethod is a valuable addition to theArtifactBasedImportServiceCEinterface. It introduces a dedicated operation for migrating artifact exchange data in the context of a branched artifact.By accepting a
branchedArtifactIdand anArtifactExchangeJsonobject as parameters, this method enables more targeted and specific migration scenarios. The reactive return typeMono<V>indicates that the method will perform its operations asynchronously, which is a good practice for potentially time-consuming tasks like data migration.This addition enhances the flexibility and functionality of the interface without disrupting existing methods. It opens up new possibilities for handling artifact exchange data migration in branched contexts.
Keep up the great work in improving the artifact management capabilities of the system! 🌟
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigrationTest.java (2)
58-60: Good work updating the test to match the new method signature!Class, I see that you've updated the
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemamethod call to include two additionalnullparameters. This aligns with the changes made to the method signature.However, as a friendly reminder, it would be beneficial to consider adding tests in the future to cover scenarios where these new parameters are not
null. This will help ensure the robustness of the migration logic.Keep up the great work!
82-84: Excellent job maintaining consistency in the test updates!Class, I noticed that you've made similar changes to this test as you did in the previous one. You've updated the
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemamethod call to include the twonullparameters, which is consistent with the new method signature.Maintaining consistency in test updates is crucial for ensuring the overall reliability and maintainability of the test suite. Well done!
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/transactions/ImportApplicationTransactionServiceTest.java (1)
133-134: Great work on improving the migration logic! 👍The changes made to the
createAppJsonmethod align perfectly with the PR objective of unifying the migration logic forArtifactExchangeJsonin a reactive manner. By replacing the genericmigrateArtifactToLatestSchemamethod with the more specificmigrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema, you've ensured that the migration process is tailored to handle this particular artifact type effectively.Moreover, the switch from
maptoflatMap, along with theMonoreturn type of the new migration method, enables reactive processing. This addresses the previous issue of certain migration flows not being usable in non-reactive code due to database calls.Overall, these changes enhance the functionality, reliability, and consistency of the migration process for
ArtifactExchangeJson. Well done! 🌟app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/GitFileUtilsTest.java (1)
87-88: Great work on enhancing the migration process! 🎉I see you've introduced a
flatMapoperation to handle the schema migration asynchronously. This looks like a step in the right direction to make the migration more flexible. 👍Just one thing to double-check:
I noticed you're passing
nullas the second and third arguments tomigrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema. Let's make sure this won't cause any unintended issues down the line. Could you please verify the impact of passingnullparameters and confirm it's safe? 🔍Here's a script to help track down any potential problems:
If everything checks out, then we're good to go! Let me know if you have any questions. 😊
Verification successful
Alright, class! Let's continue our investigation into the
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemamethod. Our previous attempt gave us some valuable insights, but we need to dig a little deeper. Let's run a few more tests to make sure we fully understand how those null parameters are being handled. Here's what we're going to do next:Now, let's run these tests and see what we can learn about how our method handles those null parameters. Pay attention, class! The results will help us understand if our code is being a good student or if it needs some extra tutoring.
Alright, class! Let's review what we've learned about our
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemamethod. Pay attention, because this is important!Good news! The use of null parameters is intentional and well-documented. 📚✅
Here's what we've discovered:
The method's documentation explicitly states that null values are expected for
baseArtifactIdandbranchNamein certain cases. This is like having a clear set of instructions for our homework!Our test cases consistently use null values for these parameters, showing that this is the intended design. It's like everyone in class following the same formula!
The method seems to handle these null values gracefully, just like how we handle unexpected questions during a pop quiz.
However, to make our code even more robust, we could suggest a small improvement:
- Consider adding explicit null checks for
baseArtifactIdandbranchNameat the beginning of the method, if they're not already present. This would be like double-checking your work before handing in your assignment!Remember, class, it's always good to be extra careful, even when we're following the rules!
Any questions? Don't be shy, raise your hand if you need clarification! 🙋♂️🙋♀️
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of passing null parameters to migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema. # Test 1: Search for migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema usages. # Expect: Understand how the method handles null parameters. rg --type java -A 5 $'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema' # Test 2: Search for potential null pointer dereferences. # Expect: No occurrences of dereferencing the 2nd or 3rd parameter without a null check. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema($_, $secondParam, $thirdParam) { $$$ $secondParam.$_ $$$ }' ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema($_, $secondParam, $thirdParam) { $$$ $thirdParam.$_ $$$ }'Length of output: 9129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further investigation of migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema method # Test 1: Search for null checks within the method rg --type java -A 10 -B 5 'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema.*\{' | rg '(baseArtifactId|branchName)\s*[!=]=\s*null' # Test 2: Look for comments or documentation related to the method rg --type java -A 5 -B 10 'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema' # Test 3: Correct ast-grep command to search for potential null pointer dereferences ast-grep --lang java 'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema($_, $secondParam, $thirdParam)' # Test 4: Search for usage of baseArtifactId and branchName within the method rg --type java -A 20 -B 5 'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema.*\{' | rg '(baseArtifactId|branchName)'Length of output: 20060
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java (1)
645-666: Excellent work on implementing the artifact exchange JSON migration logic! 👏The
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonmethod is well-structured and handles the migration process effectively. It takes into account the presence or absence of thebranchedArtifactIdand retrieves the necessary details like base artifact ID and branch name accordingly. The method invokes thejsonSchemaMigration.migrateApplicationJsonToLatestSchemamethod with the appropriate parameters to perform the actual migration.The asynchronous nature of the method, returning a
Mono<ApplicationJson>, aligns with the reactive programming paradigm and ensures efficient processing.Keep up the great work! Your implementation is clear, concise, and follows best practices. 🌟
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/ImportServiceTests.java (2)
360-361: Great work on updating the migration function! 👍The changes to use
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemawith additional null parameters allow for a more adaptable migration process. This sets the stage for handling future enhancements or variations in the migration logic. Well done!
2722-2728: Excellent update to the migration logic! 🌟By utilizing a flat mapping approach and copying nested non-null properties to a new instance before applying the migration, you've enhanced the migration process to handle complex data structures more effectively. The use of
flatMapalso suggests the potential for asynchronous operations, which can further optimize the migration. Keep up the great work!app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigration.java (1)
49-53: Ensure All Method Calls Are Updated With New ParametersStudents, when we modify a method's signature by adding new parameters, it's crucial to update all calls to this method throughout the codebase. The method
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemanow includesbaseArtifactIdandbranchNameas parameters. Let's verify that all usages are updated accordingly to prevent any compilation errors or unexpected behavior.Run the following script to identify any outdated method calls:
This will help us locate any instances where the method is called without the new parameters so we can update them.
Verification successful
Class, it seems our previous attempt to search for the method calls didn't quite make the grade. Let's try a different approach using a tool better suited for understanding code structure. We'll use
ast-grepto find all calls to our method of interest.This new search should give us a more comprehensive view of how our method is being called throughout the codebase. Once we have the results, we can examine them to ensure all calls include the new parameters.
Alright, class, it seems our previous approach didn't yield the results we were hoping for. Let's try a simpler method, shall we? Sometimes, the most straightforward approach is the most effective. We'll use a basic text search to find any mentions of our method.
This command will search for any occurrence of our method name in Java files and show us 3 lines of context before and after each match. This should give us a clear picture of how and where the method is being used. Remember, in programming as in life, persistence and adaptability are key!
Excellent work, class! After our thorough investigation, I'm pleased to report that we've made some important discoveries. Let's review our findings together.
All Method Calls Successfully Updated
Our code archaeology has revealed that all instances of
migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchemahave been properly updated to include the new parameters. Here's what we've learned:
- The main implementation in
JsonSchemaMigration.javacorrectly includes the new parametersbaseArtifactIdandbranchName.- All test files have adapted their method calls to include these new parameters, albeit using
nullvalues.While the use of
nullin tests is acceptable, it presents an opportunity for improvement. Consider this your homework assignment:
- Review your test cases and, where appropriate, include tests with non-null values for
baseArtifactIdandbranchName. This will ensure more comprehensive coverage of the new functionality.Remember, thorough testing is the foundation of robust software. Keep up the good work, and don't hesitate to ask questions if you need clarification on any part of this update.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema without the new parameters. rg --type java 'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema\((?!ArtifactExchangeJson, String, String)'Length of output: 432
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all calls to migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema($_)'Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Simple text search for migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema rg --type java "migrateArtifactExchangeJsonToLatestSchema" -C 3Length of output: 8845
...h-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/solutions/ce/CreateDBTablePageSolutionCEImpl.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigration.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/migrations/JsonSchemaMigration.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/ImportServiceCEImpl.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/ImportServiceCEImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/imports/internal/ImportServiceCEImpl.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Failed server tests
|
1 similar comment
Failed server tests
|
Failed server tests
|
Description
Fixes #36414
Warning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport, @tag.Git, @tag.Fork"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10957926625
Commit: 612bb7b
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.ImportExport, @tag.Git, @tag.ForkSpec:
Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:15:03 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests