-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: GitSyncedApps_spec - multiple IA changes #33257
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates aim to enhance the Cypress testing framework for a web application, focusing on consistency, maintainability, and functionality in test script interactions. These changes include method updates, the addition of new constants and helper functions, and modifications to element interaction strategies. Changes
Possibly related issues
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
@@ -15,6 +16,8 @@ class PageList { | |||
switcher: `.t--pages-switcher`, | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
public DefaultPageName = PAGE_ENTITY_NAME + "1"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cant you just use getNextEntityName
to generate this? Why are we manually setting this up?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes done!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@trishaanand i don't think we can do this. i am getting an error regarding dependecy https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/actions/runs/9000139783/job/24724479656
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rest LGTM except one observation
cy.wait("@getConsolidatedData"); | ||
|
||
PageList.ShowList(); | ||
EditorNavigation.SelectEntityByName(newPage, EntityType.Page); | ||
cy.get(".t--draggable-inputwidgetv2") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since you have almost rewitten the test can we make these 2 changes
"inputWidget": ".t--draggable-inputwidgetv2" —> available within Widget.json file
"dataclass": ".bp3-input" —> available in Widget.json file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@NandanAnantharamu sure makes sense! can you share the file please here. i failed to find these
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
In this spec, IA changes were required.
Link - 9th Spec in https://www.notion.so/appsmith/Cypress-tests-analysis-4090efa5e3064a2e87f262d3c399a339 Phase 1
EE - PR for runs -https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/4140
EE run -- for Git and AccessControl tags https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/actions/runs/9002744046
Fixes #
Issue Number
or
Fixes
Issue URL
Warning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?