chore(🦾): bump python simplejson 3.17.3 -> 3.19.2

[github-actions]

Updates the python "simplejson" library version from 3.17.3 to 3.19.2.

Generated by @supersetbot 🦾

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.88%. Comparing base (e1e3b99) to head (998c686).
Report is 1309 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #27757      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.47%   69.88%   +2.40%     
==========================================
  Files        1911     1912       +1     
  Lines       75024    75033       +9     
  Branches     8355     8355              
==========================================
+ Hits        50625    52439    +1814     
+ Misses      22349    20544    -1805     
  Partials     2050     2050              

Flag	Coverage Δ
hive	48.93% <0.00%> (?)
mysql	77.90% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
postgres	78.01% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
presto	53.64% <100.00%> (?)
python	83.14% <100.00%> (+4.98%)	⬆️
sqlite	77.45% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit	56.75% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mistercrunch]

Dug into this one and they switched allow_nan defaults from True to False within that release range. More info here simplejson/simplejson#324

[mistercrunch]

So I was thinking, why do we need simplejson in the first place? Is it faster than the standard lib one? Turns out it's quite a rabbit hole: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/712791/what-are-the-differences-between-json-and-simplejson-python-modules .

I'd vote for using the standard lib and simplifying out of simplejson, especially if it's essentially the same thing (?)