-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fix] Fix ConnectorPackageServiceContainer
miss implement getSavePointCommand/getRestoreCommand
#5780
[Fix] Fix ConnectorPackageServiceContainer
miss implement getSavePointCommand/getRestoreCommand
#5780
Conversation
…intCommand/getRestoreCommand
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ void beforeClass() throws Exception { | |||
SeaTunnelConfig seaTunnelConfig = ConfigProvider.locateAndGetSeaTunnelConfig(); | |||
seaTunnelConfig.getHazelcastConfig().setClusterName(testClusterName); | |||
hazelcastInstance = SeaTunnelServerStarter.createHazelcastInstance(seaTunnelConfig); | |||
Common.setDeployMode(DeployMode.CLIENT); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually you don't need set the deployMode, because it will auto set to CLIENT
if the deployMode is null.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But without this, the test case will failed now. Could you investigate it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are failed action. https://github.com/Hisoka-X/seatunnel-fork/actions/runs/6741940408/job/18327335813
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not clear if this is caused by we have some UT case set the DeployMode but doesn't clear this after the ut finished.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's merge this first. If @liunaijie have better idea for RestApiIT
. You can create a PR for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Purpose of this pull request
This PR fix
ConnectorPackageServiceContainer
miss implement getSavePointCommand/getRestoreCommand. The build will failed.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
How was this patch tested?
exist test.
Check list
New License Guide
release-note
.