Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[cleanup][broker][Modernizer] fix violations in pulsar-broker #17968

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2022

Conversation

youzipi
Copy link
Contributor

@youzipi youzipi commented Oct 8, 2022

Master Issue: #12271 #16991

Motivation

Apply Maven Modernizer plugin to enforce we move away from legacy APIs.

Modifications

  • fix violations in pulsar-broker package.

Verifying this change

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API: (no)
  • The schema: (no)
  • The default values of configurations: (no)
  • The wire protocol: (no)
  • The rest endpoints: (no)
  • The admin cli options: (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment: (no)

Documentation

  • doc-not-needed

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository: youzipi#2

@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs label Oct 8, 2022
@youzipi
Copy link
Contributor Author

youzipi commented Oct 8, 2022

@MarvinCai @tisonkun

Copy link
Member

@tisonkun tisonkun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool! I think this PR actually closes #16991 and #12271?

@youzipi
Copy link
Contributor Author

youzipi commented Oct 8, 2022

Cool! I think this PR actually closes #16991 and #12271?

yes, we can close these issues.
but there are still some modules not having this check, the list was made one year ago and the amount of modules is continuously growing (ex: pulsar-io modules).

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member

tisonkun commented Oct 8, 2022

@youzipi OK. I think we can narrow the scope to what that issue originally has. We can (you can! of course :)) create a new issue to track new effort. IIRC @MarvinCai has lees time to track #12271 and thus keep it open doesn't reflect the situation :)

Copy link
Contributor

@MarvinCai MarvinCai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, really appreciate your contribution

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member

tisonkun commented Oct 9, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

Copy link
Contributor

@codelipenghui codelipenghui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution.

@codelipenghui codelipenghui added this to the 2.12.0 milestone Oct 10, 2022
@tisonkun
Copy link
Member

@codelipenghui you may change the PR description as:

* This closes #12271.
* This closes #16991.

as mentioned in #17968 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants