Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

[OpPerf] Fix axis_shape and function mismatch for LTS #17894

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2020

Conversation

ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@access2rohit Thanks for reminding

@ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [sanity]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [sanity]

@ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-gpu]

@ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu, windows-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-gpu, windows-cpu]

@leezu
Copy link
Contributor

leezu commented Apr 5, 2020

@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-cpu, unix-gpu, centos-cpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-gpu, centos-cpu, unix-cpu]

@leezu leezu mentioned this pull request Apr 5, 2020
7 tasks
@leezu leezu merged commit 2fff11d into apache:master Apr 5, 2020
@ChaiBapchya ChaiBapchya deleted the fix_lts branch April 5, 2020 20:28
@marcoabreu
Copy link
Contributor

No Test!?

@ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor Author

ChaiBapchya commented Apr 6, 2020

There's no test for OpPerf per se. But for every PR related to opperf, PR Author is expected to run the test utility [cpu+gpu] and confirm if its working or not.
I did that locally.

mk-61 pushed a commit to mk-61/incubator-mxnet that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants