Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[KYUUBI #6948] Test Changing Column Comment #6953

Conversation

davidyuan1223
Copy link
Contributor

Why are the changes needed?

Range check Test case missing paimon changing column comment, add the test case
#6948

How was this patch tested?

Test Ranger check with paimon changing column comment command

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (525aec0) to head (983720e).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #6953   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files         689     689           
  Lines       42615   42615           
  Branches     5808    5808           
======================================
  Misses      42615   42615           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pan3793 pan3793 added this to the v1.11.0 milestone Mar 6, 2025
@pan3793 pan3793 closed this in 65d4b33 Mar 6, 2025
@pan3793
Copy link
Member

pan3793 commented Mar 6, 2025

Thanks, merged to master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants