-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
fix(java): fix disallowed.txt check in windows #2128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9e9f7b1
to
9168ff9
Compare
9168ff9
to
6c4fbe9
Compare
3b90d81
to
8aeac5e
Compare
pandalee99
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
chaokunyang
added a commit
to chaokunyang/fury
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2025
## What does this PR do? - add windows ci for java21 - Fix sha256 check error on windows:  ## Related issues Closes apache#2100 ## Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? <!-- If any user-facing interface changes, please [open an issue](https://github.com/apache/fury/issues/new/choose) describing the need to do so and update the document if necessary. --> - [ ] Does this PR introduce any public API change? - [ ] Does this PR introduce any binary protocol compatibility change? ## Benchmark <!-- When the PR has an impact on performance (if you don't know whether the PR will have an impact on performance, you can submit the PR first, and if it will have impact on performance, the code reviewer will explain it), be sure to attach a benchmark data here. -->
chaokunyang
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2025
## What does this PR do? - add windows ci for java21 - Fix sha256 check error on windows:  ## Related issues Closes #2100 ## Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? <!-- If any user-facing interface changes, please [open an issue](https://github.com/apache/fury/issues/new/choose) describing the need to do so and update the document if necessary. --> - [ ] Does this PR introduce any public API change? - [ ] Does this PR introduce any binary protocol compatibility change? ## Benchmark <!-- When the PR has an impact on performance (if you don't know whether the PR will have an impact on performance, you can submit the PR first, and if it will have impact on performance, the code reviewer will explain it), be sure to attach a benchmark data here. -->
2 tasks
chaokunyang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2025
<!-- **Thanks for contributing to Fury.** **If this is your first time opening a PR on fury, you can refer to [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/fury/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).** Contribution Checklist - The **Apache Fury (incubating)** community has restrictions on the naming of pr titles. You can also find instructions in [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/fury/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md). - Fury has a strong focus on performance. If the PR you submit will have an impact on performance, please benchmark it first and provide the benchmark result here. --> ## What does this PR do? It appears that [PR #2128](#2128) did not truly resolve this issue, as it only modified the test case code without addressing the actual runtime logic. This PR re-fixes the problem. <!-- Describe the purpose of this PR. --> ## Related issues <!-- Is there any related issue? Please attach here. - #xxxx0 - #xxxx1 - #xxxx2 --> ## Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? <!-- If any user-facing interface changes, please [open an issue](https://github.com/apache/fury/issues/new/choose) describing the need to do so and update the document if necessary. --> - [ ] Does this PR introduce any public API change? - [ ] Does this PR introduce any binary protocol compatibility change? ## Benchmark <!-- When the PR has an impact on performance (if you don't know whether the PR will have an impact on performance, you can submit the PR first, and if it will have impact on performance, the code reviewer will explain it), be sure to attach a benchmark data here. -->
chaokunyang
pushed a commit
to chaokunyang/fury
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2025
<!-- **Thanks for contributing to Fury.** **If this is your first time opening a PR on fury, you can refer to [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/fury/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).** Contribution Checklist - The **Apache Fury (incubating)** community has restrictions on the naming of pr titles. You can also find instructions in [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/fury/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md). - Fury has a strong focus on performance. If the PR you submit will have an impact on performance, please benchmark it first and provide the benchmark result here. --> ## What does this PR do? It appears that [PR apache#2128](apache#2128) did not truly resolve this issue, as it only modified the test case code without addressing the actual runtime logic. This PR re-fixes the problem. <!-- Describe the purpose of this PR. --> ## Related issues <!-- Is there any related issue? Please attach here. - #xxxx0 - #xxxx1 - #xxxx2 --> ## Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? <!-- If any user-facing interface changes, please [open an issue](https://github.com/apache/fury/issues/new/choose) describing the need to do so and update the document if necessary. --> - [ ] Does this PR introduce any public API change? - [ ] Does this PR introduce any binary protocol compatibility change? ## Benchmark <!-- When the PR has an impact on performance (if you don't know whether the PR will have an impact on performance, you can submit the PR first, and if it will have impact on performance, the code reviewer will explain it), be sure to attach a benchmark data here. -->
chaokunyang
pushed a commit
to chaokunyang/fury
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2025
<!-- **Thanks for contributing to Fury.** **If this is your first time opening a PR on fury, you can refer to [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/fury/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).** Contribution Checklist - The **Apache Fury (incubating)** community has restrictions on the naming of pr titles. You can also find instructions in [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/fury/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md). - Fury has a strong focus on performance. If the PR you submit will have an impact on performance, please benchmark it first and provide the benchmark result here. --> ## What does this PR do? It appears that [PR apache#2128](apache#2128) did not truly resolve this issue, as it only modified the test case code without addressing the actual runtime logic. This PR re-fixes the problem. <!-- Describe the purpose of this PR. --> ## Related issues <!-- Is there any related issue? Please attach here. - #xxxx0 - #xxxx1 - #xxxx2 --> ## Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? <!-- If any user-facing interface changes, please [open an issue](https://github.com/apache/fury/issues/new/choose) describing the need to do so and update the document if necessary. --> - [ ] Does this PR introduce any public API change? - [ ] Does this PR introduce any binary protocol compatibility change? ## Benchmark <!-- When the PR has an impact on performance (if you don't know whether the PR will have an impact on performance, you can submit the PR first, and if it will have impact on performance, the code reviewer will explain it), be sure to attach a benchmark data here. -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Related issues
Closes #2100
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Benchmark