Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TEST] Test running with different toolchains #14656

Closed

Conversation

alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Feb 13, 2025

This is a PR to test that modifying the rust-toolchain.toml file will really use a different toolchain

Aka it is a test for this PR:

Looks promising:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/actions/runs/13316965071/job/37193269066?pr=14656#step:4:114


info: using existing install for 'stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
info: default toolchain set to 'stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'

  stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu unchanged - rustc 1.84.1 (e71f9a9a9 2025-01-27)

info: note that the toolchain '1.84.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu' is currently in use (overridden by '/__w/datafusion/datafusion/rust-toolchain.toml')
+ timeout 120 rustup component add rustfmt
info: syncing channel updates for '1.84.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'

@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 13, 2025
# to compile this workspace and run CI jobs.

[toolchain]
channel = "1.84.0"

This comment was marked as outdated.

@alamb alamb changed the title Alamb/pin toolchain different version [TESTING] Test with different rust-toolchain Feb 13, 2025
@alamb alamb changed the title [TESTING] Test with different rust-toolchain [TEST] Test running with different toolchains Feb 13, 2025
@alamb alamb closed this Feb 13, 2025
@alamb alamb deleted the alamb/pin_toolchain_different_version branch February 14, 2025 14:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant