Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-2.62.0] Roll forward the dependency upgrade commit. #33638

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tvalentyn
Copy link
Contributor

Undo c08adb2.

We should either revert fd17dce or do nothing as per preexisting condition clause (see the release thread).


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@tvalentyn tvalentyn changed the title Set Dataflow container to release version. Roll forward the dependency upgrade commit. Jan 17, 2025
@tvalentyn tvalentyn changed the title Roll forward the dependency upgrade commit. [release-2.62.0] Roll forward the dependency upgrade commit. Jan 17, 2025
@tvalentyn
Copy link
Contributor Author

R: @kennknowles

Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

@liferoad
Copy link
Contributor

No need to do this. @kennknowles 's reverting PR is correct.

@tvalentyn
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvalentyn commented Jan 17, 2025

I didn't look closely enough, yes, reverting @liferoad's commit was correct, I assumed it was a dependency upgrade commit done one the branch earlier.

@tvalentyn tvalentyn closed this Jan 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants