Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

AVRO-3916: [Rust] Add TimestampNanos types #2611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2023
Merged

AVRO-3916: [Rust] Add TimestampNanos types #2611

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

martin-g
Copy link
Member

@martin-g martin-g commented Dec 7, 2023

AVRO-3916

What is the purpose of the change

  • Add support for the new logical types:
  • timestamp-nanos
  • local-timestamp-nanos

Verifying this change

  • New unit tests are added. All old ones should pass too!

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? yes
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? - the specification is updated

@martin-g
AVRO-3916: [Rust] Add [Local]TimestampNanos types
6aa4686 
Signed-off-by: Martin Tzvetanov Grigorov <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Rust label Dec 7, 2023
@martin-g martin-g merged commit e9f10b8 into main Dec 8, 2023
15 checks passed
@martin-g martin-g deleted the avro-3916-rust-timestamp-nanos branch December 8, 2023 07:31
martin-g added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
@martin-g
AVRO-3916: [Rust] Add [Local]TimestampNanos types (#2611)
8fcdf52 
Signed-off-by: Martin Tzvetanov Grigorov <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e9f10b8)
RanbirK pushed a commit to RanbirK/avro that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
@martin-g
AVRO-3916: [Rust] Add [Local]TimestampNanos types (apache#2611)
86a8bc0 
Signed-off-by: Martin Tzvetanov Grigorov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Rust
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@martin-g