Databricks: stop including user names in list_jobs

[stephenpurcell-db]

When querying list_jobs, by default the owning user's name is resolved. This field is not used on the Airflow side, and the lookup is (relatively) expensive.

With this new argument, the lookup is skipped. This will make requests faster and more reliable.

---

[boring-cyborg]

Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check our Contributors' Guide (https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/README.rst)
Here are some useful points:

• Pay attention to the quality of your code (ruff, mypy and type annotations). Our pre-commits will help you with that.
• In case of a new feature add useful documentation (in docstrings or in docs/ directory). Adding a new operator? Check this short guide Consider adding an example DAG that shows how users should use it.
• Consider using Breeze environment for testing locally, it's a heavy docker but it ships with a working Airflow and a lot of integrations.
• Be patient and persistent. It might take some time to get a review or get the final approval from Committers.
• Please follow ASF Code of Conduct for all communication including (but not limited to) comments on Pull Requests, Mailing list and Slack.
• Be sure to read the Airflow Coding style.
• Always keep your Pull Requests rebased, otherwise your build might fail due to changes not related to your commits.
  Apache Airflow is a community-driven project and together we are making it better 🚀.
  In case of doubts contact the developers at:
  Mailing List: [email protected]
  Slack: https://s.apache.org/airflow-slack

[potiuk]

Isn't "false" default doing the same?

[stephenpurcell-db]

Isn't "false" default doing the same?

@potiuk include_user_names=false will skip name resolution. Omitting this param defaults it to true in the API.
I provide a default value in list_jobs to allow other usages to explicitly set it to true, following the pattern already used by expand_tasks.

[potiuk]

Right :D

[potiuk]

tests need fixing though

[stephenpurcell-db]

@potiuk thanks! I think the tests should pass now.

[potiuk]

Almost. BTW. Installing pre-commit and running them on the change should auto-fix all static errors.

[stephenpurcell-db]

@potiuk rectified now by running the pre-commit hooks, thank you for the guidance.

[boring-cyborg]

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to check our Issue Tracker for additional contributions.