Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove assertonly #289

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 10, 2021

Conversation

felixfontein
Copy link
Contributor

SUMMARY

Removes the assertonly provider from x509_certificate.

This isn't complete yet, since some tests for other backends use assertonly as well.

ISSUE TYPE
  • Feature Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME

x509_certificate

@felixfontein felixfontein mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2021
5 tasks
@felixfontein felixfontein changed the title [WIP] Remove assertonly Remove assertonly Sep 28, 2021
@felixfontein
Copy link
Contributor Author

ready_for_review

@felixfontein
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MarkusTeufelberger @Ajpantuso would be great if you could take a look at this one.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Ajpantuso Ajpantuso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, pulled this locally and didn't find any stale references either.

@felixfontein
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll merge this tomorrow (and rebase #290 and bump the galaxy.yml version in it). @MarkusTeufelberger if you want more time to look at this, please tell me before then, then I'll wait longer.

@MarkusTeufelberger
Copy link
Contributor

I'm fine with it, but haven't looked deeply into the changes besides the changed lines.

@felixfontein felixfontein merged commit 5f1efb6 into ansible-collections:main Oct 10, 2021
@felixfontein felixfontein deleted the remove-assertonly branch October 10, 2021 08:24
@felixfontein
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ajpantuso @MarkusTeufelberger thanks for reviewing this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants