Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support windows path in validate_file checks #297

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

stevenslack
Copy link
Contributor

@stevenslack stevenslack commented Dec 12, 2023

Summary

Fixes #296 where the code checks paths for "validity" by checking the return value of validate_file to ensure that it is 0, but a valid Windows filepath on a Windows system will return 2, making it so that this plugin cannot run on a Windows host (either for local development or via Windows Server).

What changed

This PR replaces the validate_file check to ensure it returns either 0 or 2.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Improved path validation logic to enhance security and maintainability.
    • Streamlined script loading process by utilizing the updated path validation function.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted path validation to correctly handle additional valid cases, reducing false negatives in file checks.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2023

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the logic for path validation in a PHP codebase to support Windows file paths. The validate_path function now accepts paths that return either 0 (valid path) or 2 (valid Windows path) from the validate_file function. This modification is then used to streamline checks within other functions that previously performed separate file existence and validation checks.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/assets.php Updated validate_path to accept valid Windows paths; refactored load_scripts to use validate_path.
src/meta.php Refactored to use validate_path for file existence and validation checks.

Related issues

  • Support Windows Paths wp-curate#109: This issue describes a bug where Windows paths are not supported due to the validate_file check only allowing a return value of 0. The changes in this PR address this by allowing a return value of 2 as well, which is consistent with the issue's suggested fix.
  • Support Windows Paths #296: Similar to the above, this issue reports a problem with Windows paths not being recognized as valid. The PR's changes directly address this concern by updating the validation logic to support Windows paths.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ?


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • You can reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit.
  • You can also chat with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code or files in the PR by tagging @coderabbitai in a new comment.
  • You can tag @coderabbitai in a PR comment and ask questions about the PR and the codebase.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72e3138 and 8394367.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/assets.php (2 hunks)
  • src/meta.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
src/assets.php (4)
  • 16-19: The update to the validate_path function to accept a return value of 2 from validate_file as valid is consistent with the PR's objective to support Windows file paths.

  • 119-125: The load_scripts function has been correctly updated to use the validate_path function, centralizing the path validation logic and ensuring consistency with the new validation rules.

  • 16-22: The search for direct calls to validate_file and file_exists within the src/ directory only returned the instance that was already modified in the validate_path function. This suggests that there are no other instances in the src/ directory where validate_file and file_exists are used together in a way that should be replaced by the updated validate_path function.

Based on the search results, it appears that the codebase is consistent with the use of the updated validate_path function where necessary.

Analysis chain

Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [16-125]

Verify if there are any remaining direct calls to validate_file and file_exists that should be replaced with calls to the updated validate_path function for consistency.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct calls to `validate_file` and `file_exists` that should be replaced with `validate_path`
rg --pcre2 'validate_file\(.+\) && file_exists\(.+\)' src/

Length of output: 173

* 16-19: Verify that the `validate_file` function has been updated accordingly to handle the new return value of `2` as valid, as this change is not visible in the provided hunks.
src/meta.php (1)
  • 135-140: The implementation of validate_path in src/assets.php confirms that it returns true if validate_file returns either 0 or 2, and additionally checks if the file exists. This aligns with the PR's objective to support Windows file paths by adjusting the validate_file checks to accept a return value of 0 or 2 as valid.

The change in register_post_meta_from_defs to use validate_path for file validation is therefore correctly implemented to support the intended functionality on Windows systems.

Analysis chain

The change to use validate_path for file validation in register_post_meta_from_defs aligns with the PR's objective to support Windows file paths. Ensure that validate_path is implemented to return true for both 0 and 2 as valid return values from validate_file.


The validate_path function is defined in the src/assets.php file. To verify that it correctly handles the return values from validate_file, I will need to check the implementation within that file.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of `validate_path` to ensure it handles return values correctly.
rg "function validate_path" --files-with-matches

Length of output: 65



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the implementation of `validate_path` from `src/assets.php`
rg --context 10 "function validate_path" src/assets.php

Length of output: 756

@stevenslack stevenslack merged commit d29cef4 into develop Dec 12, 2023
7 checks passed
@stevenslack stevenslack deleted the hotfix/support-windows-path branch December 12, 2023 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Windows Paths
2 participants