Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More clean up. #3586

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 26, 2021
Merged

Conversation

davinchia
Copy link
Contributor

@davinchia davinchia commented May 25, 2021

What

The first 6 points of #3464.

Will remove the debugging statements before merging in.

How

Various clean up and fixes. All pretty simple/straightforward.

The only interesting thing about this PR is the kube pod shutdown. For whatever reason, the OkHttpPool isn't respecting the evictAll call and 1 idle thread remains. So instead of shutting down immediately, the worker pod shuts down after 5 mins when the idle thread id reaped. There isn't an easy way to modify the pool's idle reap configuration now. I do not think this issue is blocking since it's relatively benign, so I vote we create a ticket and come back to this once we do an e2e test.

See https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/3586/files#diff-313805107b9eb92e35dfa2bb96aa906ccfe42bf27fe113f7098821303dacc476R93 for info.

Recommended reading order

  1. KubePodProcess.java (meat of change is here)
  2. KubePodProcessTest.java
  3. the rest

@davinchia davinchia requested review from jrhizor and cgardens May 25, 2021 13:24
@@ -8,6 +8,15 @@ plugins {

application {
mainClass = 'io.airbyte.workers.process.KubeProcessBuilderFactoryPOC'
applicationDefaultJvmArgs = ['-Xmx500m',
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For remote debugging. Will remove before merging into branch. Leaving this here in case someone wants to take a look at what I saw.

port forwarding the port to localhost 6000 and attaching visual vm to the 6000 will confirm okhttp is the thread leak.

private static final KubernetesClient KUBE_CLIENT = new DefaultKubernetesClient();

// todo: this should really be cached
public static String getCommandFromImage(String imageName) throws IOException {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I moved all these functions to KubePodProcess as there was a hidden cyclic dependency. The process builder factory called the kube pod process class that called the factory back for these static functions when creating the process.

LOGGER.info("Done!");

System.exit(0); // todo: handle executors so we don't need to kill the JVM
// Debug Statements, to remove both merging.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These will be removed before merge.

@@ -30,7 +39,7 @@ dependencies {
implementation project(':airbyte-protocol:models')

testImplementation 'org.mockito:mockito-inline:2.13.0'
testImplementation 'org.testcontainers:testcontainers:1.14.3'
testImplementation 'org.testcontainers:testcontainers:1.15.3'
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was running into intermittent test errors without this.

@davinchia davinchia marked this pull request as ready for review May 25, 2021 13:34
Copy link
Contributor

@jrhizor jrhizor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

I don't see make a processbuilderfactory that uses KubePodProcess which is checked on the feature branch?

I'm going to address my own comments and merge this in today. I'll leave the debugging comments though.

@davinchia davinchia merged commit d605c74 into davinchia/kube-queueing-poc May 26, 2021
@davinchia davinchia deleted the davinchia/kube-api-cleanup branch May 26, 2021 04:30
jrhizor added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2021
* Use CDK to generate source that can be configured to emit a certain number of records and always works.

* Checkpoint: socat works from inside the docker container.

* Override the entry point.

* Clean up and add ReadMe.

* Clean up socat.

* Checkpoint: connect to Kube cluster and list all the pods.

* Checkpoint: Sync worker pod is able to send output to the destination pod.

* Checkpoint: Sync worker creates Dest pod if none existed previously. It also waits for the pod to be ready before doing anything else. Sync worker will also remove the pod on termination.

* update readme

* Checkpoint: Dest pod does nott restart after finishing. Comment out delete command in Sync worker.

* working towards named pipes

* named pipes working

* update readme

* WIP named pipe / socat sidecar kube port forwarding (#3518)

* nearly working sources

* update

* stdin example

* move all kube testing yamls into the airbyte-workers directories. sort the airbyte-workers resource folder; place all the poc yamls together.

* Format.

* Put back the original KubeProcessBuilderFactory.

* Fix slight errors.

* Checkpoint: Worker pod knows its own IP. Successfully starts and writes to Dest pod after refactor.

* remove unused file and update readme

* Dest pod loops back into worker pod. However, the right messages do not seem to be passing in.

* Switch back to worker ip.

* SWEET VICTORY!.

* wrap kube pod in process (#3540)

also clean up kubernetes deploys.

* More clean up. (#3586)

The first 6 points of #3464.

The only interesting thing about this PR is the kube pod shutdown. For whatever reason, the OkHttpPool isn't respecting the evictAll call and 1 idle thread remains. So instead of shutting down immediately, the worker pod shuts down after 5 mins when the idle thread id reaped. There isn't an easy way to modify the pool's idle reap configuration now. I do not think this issue is blocking since it's relatively benign, so I vote we create a ticket and come back to this once we do an e2e test.

* Implements redirecting standard error as well. (#3623)

* Clean up before next implementation.

* kube process launching (#3790)

* processes must handle file mounting

* remove comment

* default to base entrypoint

* use process builder factory / select stdin / use a pool of ports

* fix up

* add super hacky copying example

* Checkpoint: Works end to end!

* Checkpoint: Use API to make sure init container is ready instead of blind sleep. Propagate exception in DefaultCheckConnectionWorker.

* Refactor KubePodProcess. Checked to make sure everything still works.

* Format.

* Clean up code. Begin putting this into variables and breaking up long constructor function.

* Add comments to explain what is happening.

* fix normalization test

* increase timeout for initcontainer

Co-authored-by: Davin Chia <[email protected]>

* facepalm moment

* clean up kube poc pr (#3834)

* clean up

* remove source-always-works

* create separate commons-docker

* fix test

* enable kube e2e tests (#3866)

* enable kube e2e tests

* use more generally accepted env definition

* use new runners

* use its own runner and install minikube differently

* update name

* use kubectl alias

* use link instead of alias that doesn't propagate

* start minikube

* use driver=none

* go back to using action

* mess with versions

* revert runner

* install socat

* print logs after run

* also try re-runnining tasks

* always wait for file transfer

* use ports

* increase wait timeout for kube

* use different localhost ips and bump normalization to include an entrypoint

* proposed fix

* all working locally

* revert temporary changes

* revert normalization image change that's happening in a separate pr

* readability

* final comment

* Working Kube Cancel. (#3983)

* Port over the basic changes.

* Add logic to return proper exit code in the event of termination. Add comments to explain why.

* revert envs change and merge master to fix kube acceptance tests (#4012)

* use older env format

* fix build

Co-authored-by: jrhizor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jared Rhizor <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants