-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix code scanning alert no. 10: Incomplete URL substring sanitization #918
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/background.js (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/background.js (1)
196-196
: Appropriate use ofisAllowedDomain
in cookie handlingThe use of
isAllowedDomain(cookie.domain)
effectively ensures that the cookie expiration date is set only for cookies from allowed domains, enhancing security by controlling cookie lifespans appropriately.
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/background.js (1)
207-217
: Well-implemented domain validation functionThe
isAllowedDomain
function is correctly implemented and follows best practices:
- It handles domains with or without a leading dot.
- Uses the URL API for robust parsing.
- Checks for both exact matches and subdomains.
Consider a minor optimization:
function isAllowedDomain(domain) { const allowedDomains = [ "aliyun.com", "qianwen.aliyun.com" ]; - const parsedHost = new URL(`https://${domain.startsWith(".") ? domain.substring(1) : domain}`).host; + const parsedHost = new URL(`https://${domain.replace(/^\./, '')}`).host; return allowedDomains.some( (allowedDomain) => parsedHost === allowedDomain || parsedHost.endsWith(`.${allowedDomain}`) ); }This change simplifies the domain parsing logic using a regular expression, making it slightly more concise and easier to read.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/background.js (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/background.js (2)
195-197
: Improved domain check logicThe replacement of hardcoded domain checks with the
isAllowedDomain
function enhances code maintainability and flexibility. This change centralizes domain validation logic, making it easier to update the list of allowed domains in the future.
Line range hint
518-522
: Correct implementation of cookie expiration date calculationThe
setCookieExpireDate
function correctly calculates the cookie expiration date:
- It uses the provided number of days to set the future date.
- Returns the expiration date in seconds since the epoch, which is the correct format for cookie expiration.
The implementation is correct and follows best practices.
54fbeec
to
969ee65
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
d05c8fb
to
3be84ad
Compare
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
3be84ad
to
d30570c
Compare
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
…ai-shifu#918) Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes https://github.com/ai-shifu/ChatALL/security/code-scanning/10
To fix the problem, we need to ensure that the domain check is robust and cannot be bypassed by embedding the allowed host in unexpected locations. The best way to achieve this is by using a whitelist of allowed domains and performing an exact match against the parsed host of the URL.
Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor