Plz

[r0man]

Hi @ahyatt,

we now have a release of plz: alphapapa/plz.el#50

It's not on ELPA yet, but I hope this is done by some cron job that runs eventually.

This PR removes the vendored plz.el and adds it to the package requires.

[ahyatt]

I'm happy to see this go in, thank you! Next step, I think, is to make sure the emacs-devel list is fine with your plan to eventually release the various handles you have as a separate GNU ELPA package, specifically for plz. Once we're sure that they think it is reasonable, then we're good to go on my side.

[r0man]

Hi @ahyatt,

the ELPA maintainers are fine with adding plz-media-type and plz-event-source to ELPA. We actually have it already:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/log/

Once we are fine everything works as expected with the vendored libraries we can remove the -pre from the libraries and they will be released as official packages.

Roman

[ahyatt]

Excellent, thank you! Can these be required via package-requires now, in their -pre state?

[r0man]

No, until they are released they should not be added to the package-requires section, otherwise tools might try to install the libraries from some package archive and fail.

[ahyatt]

I am still not seeing your packages in GNU ELPA. Do you know what is going on with that?

[r0man]

Hi @ahyatt,

Philip added both libraries into the ELPA Git repository 2 weeks ago. I put you on CC in this conversation.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-05/msg00015.html
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/log/

They won't appear on the ELPA website until I remove the -pre suffix from the version.

I'm still under the assumption that we ship plz-media-type and plz-event-source with the llm library initially and release them to ELPA once we are sure there aren't any serious flaws. The timeline being half a year, as we discussed.

I'm using the plz branch of the llm library since 2 weeks now with the OpenAI and my custom OpenAI provider. I haven't noticed anything wrong. So those are good to go.

Did you had the chance to test the other providers using the plz branch?

What's the plan?

[ahyatt]

Thanks, I did see that conversation, but forgot about the resolution. I need to resolve an issue with the llm version, and then I'll merge the plz branch to main and push it out. I'm fairly busy this week, so hopefully that can happen near the end of the week or the weekend.

[r0man]

Ok, cool. I'm looking forward to it!

[leotaku]

As far as I can see, both plz-media-type and plz-event-source are now available on GNU ELPA. Would you welcome a PR that un-vendors these packages?

[ahyatt]

I believe @r0man wanted some time to be sure there aren't any flaws. It's been a few months since we heard of any issue, so I think it probably does make sense to un-vendor them. @r0man, what do you think?

[r0man]

Hi @ahyatt and @leotaku ,

yes, I think we could unbundle them. I tagged the plz-media-type and plz-event-source libraries a while ago with a version and published them to ELPA, because I was using them also in another project.

Nothing should have changed functionality wise from the bundled version we have in the llm library.
I'm a bit busy at the moment, and just haven't got around un-bundling this myself.

So if you would like to do it @leotaku , please go ahead!

Thanks, Roman.