openjdk: add jdk tier1 cipher tests #5971
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2635,6 +2635,35 @@ | |
| <feature>FIPS140_3_OpenJCEPlusFIPS.FIPS140-3:nonapplicable</feature> | ||
| </features> | ||
| </test> | ||
| <test> | ||
| <testCaseName>jdk11_tier1_cipher</testCaseName> | ||
| <command>$(JAVA_COMMAND) -Xmx512m -jar $(Q)$(TEST_RESROOT)$(D)jtreg$(D)lib$(D)jtreg.jar$(Q) \ | ||
| $(JTREG_BASIC_OPTIONS) $(JDK_NATIVE_OPTIONS) -vmoptions:$(Q)-Xmx512m $(JVM_OPTIONS) $(VMOPTION_HEADLESS)$(Q) \ | ||
| $(TIMEOUT_HANDLER) \ | ||
| -w $(Q)$(REPORTDIR)$(D)work$(Q) \ | ||
| -r $(Q)$(REPORTDIR)$(D)report$(Q) \ | ||
| -jdk:$(Q)$(TEST_JDK_HOME)$(Q) \ | ||
| -exclude:$(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR)$(D)ProblemList.txt$(Q) \ | ||
| -exclude:$(Q)$(TEST_RESROOT)$(D)$(PROBLEM_LIST_FILE)$(Q) \ | ||
| ${FEATURE_PROBLEM_LIST_FILE} \ | ||
| ${VENDOR_PROBLEM_LIST_FILE} \ | ||
| $(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR)/com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher$(Q); \ | ||
| $(TEST_STATUS)</command> | ||
| <versions> | ||
| <version>11+</version> | ||
| </versions> | ||
| <levels> | ||
| <level>sanity</level> | ||
| </levels> | ||
| <groups> | ||
| <group>openjdk</group> | ||
| </groups> | ||
| <features> | ||
| <feature>FIPS140_2:nonapplicable</feature> | ||
| <feature>FIPS140_3_OpenJCEPlusFIPS:nonapplicable</feature> | ||
| <feature>FIPS140_3_OpenJCEPlusFIPS.FIPS140-3:nonapplicable</feature> | ||
|
Comment on lines
+2662
to
+2664
There was a problem hiding this comment. @jasonkatonica should we run There was a problem hiding this comment. To be honest, I don't really know implications of this in testing (and how to test it works with FIPS on adoptium infra?). Maybe it could make sense to also run this in FIPS. (I just kept features section there as it was in other related target, I based this on. ) There was a problem hiding this comment. HI @llxia Yes in general the tests in the There was a problem hiding this comment. Thanks @jasonkatonica . Yes, we are already running these tests. |
||
| </features> | ||
| </test> | ||
| <test> | ||
| <testCaseName>jdk_vector</testCaseName> | ||
| <disables> | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test runs for JDK11+. Please remove
jdk11from testCaseName. To align with other test name, we should call itjdk_cipher.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used this name to be consistent with related targets
jdk11_tier1_buffer,jdk11_tier1_iso8859,jdk11_tier1_pack200(above new one in playlist). Only pack200 is 11 other ones are 11+. (Non of these have name inTEST.groupsin openjdk.)