Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor!: fatras: double for globalAngle #3922

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AJPfleger
Copy link
Contributor

@AJPfleger AJPfleger commented Nov 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced precision in angle calculations by updating parameter types in the globalAngle method.
    • Improved handling of edge cases in the sampleContinuousValues method for better robustness.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected a comment in the sampleKinematics method for clarity.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified return syntax in the globalAngle method for improved readability.

@AJPfleger AJPfleger added this to the next milestone Nov 29, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

Changes made to the NuclearInteraction class in the NuclearInteraction.hpp and NuclearInteraction.cpp files involve updates to method signatures and internal logic. The globalAngle method's parameters were changed from float to double, enhancing precision. The return statement now uses structured binding for better readability. Minor corrections were made in comments, and an early exit condition was added to the sampleContinuousValues method to improve robustness. Overall, these changes focus on type precision and clarity without altering core functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
Fatras/include/ActsFatras/Physics/NuclearInteraction/NuclearInteraction.hpp Updated method signature for globalAngle from float to double for last two parameters. Corrected comment in sampleKinematics.
Fatras/src/Physics/NuclearInteraction/NuclearInteraction.cpp Updated method signature for globalAngle from float to double for last two parameters. Changed local variable types to double. Simplified return statement using brace initialization. Added early exit condition in sampleContinuousValues.

Poem

In the realm of angles, precise and bright,
Doubles now dance, bringing clarity's light.
With comments corrected, the code flows with grace,
A robust new path in the nuclear space.
Oh, how it shines, this code we adore,
Enhancing our methods, forever we soar! ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Component - Fatras Affects the Fatras module label Nov 29, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Fatras/src/Physics/NuclearInteraction/NuclearInteraction.cpp (1)

141-144: Good changes these are, but document them we should!

Consistent with parameter changes, the local variables now use double precision, they do. Modern C++ style in return statement, I sense. Yet, a comment explaining the units of angles (radians or degrees), helpful it would be.

Add this comment above the return statement:

+ // Returns {phi, theta} in radians in the global coordinate system
  return {phi, theta};
Fatras/include/ActsFatras/Physics/NuclearInteraction/NuclearInteraction.hpp (1)

486-486: Optimize the sampling retry logic, we should.

Wise the comment correction is, but improve the retry logic we can. Early exit when trials exceed limit, more efficient it would be.

Consider this improvement:

-    if (trials++ % nMatchingTrials == 0) {
+    if (++trials > nMatchingTrialsTotal) {
+      return std::nullopt;
+    }
+    if (trials % nMatchingTrials == 0) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c9444e and db6f652.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Fatras/include/ActsFatras/Physics/NuclearInteraction/NuclearInteraction.hpp (3 hunks)
  • Fatras/src/Physics/NuclearInteraction/NuclearInteraction.cpp (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Fatras/src/Physics/NuclearInteraction/NuclearInteraction.cpp (2)

116-117: Approve these changes, I do! Hmmmm.

Wise decision it is, to use double precision for angular calculations. More accurate the physics simulations shall be, yes!


Line range hint 116-144: Verify precision consistency in related code paths, we must!

Through the Force, sense other places where precision matters, I do. Check we must, that no precision is lost when these values are used.

Fatras/include/ActsFatras/Physics/NuclearInteraction/NuclearInteraction.hpp (2)

516-522: Clear and elegant, this code has become. Approve it, I do!

Strong with the Force, these changes are:

  • Structured binding for better readability
  • Modern constant usage with std::numbers::pi
  • Clear direction calculation

294-295: Approve the parameter type change, I do! Hmmmm.

Wise decision it is, to use double precision for angle calculations. Better accuracy this brings to the Force of nuclear interactions.

Verify the impact of this change throughout the codebase, we must:

✅ Verification successful

Consistent with the Force, this change is!

Observed have I, that all callers of globalAngle already use double precision, they do! No conflicts in the codebase exist. While other angle calculations still use float in different parts of the codebase, they do, independent systems they are, affecting not our nuclear interactions, hmm.

The implementation and its usage:

  • In NuclearInteraction.cpp, double precision it uses
  • In NuclearInteraction.hpp, structured binding with double precision it employs
  • All callers, aligned with double precision they are

Safe this change is, as isolated within the nuclear interaction system it remains. Other float usages in the codebase, different concerns they address, hmm.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining float usage in angle calculations
rg -g '!*.{md,txt}' '\b(float|Float)\b.*\b(angle|theta|phi)\b' 

Length of output: 5051


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of globalAngle function to check if callers expect float or double
rg -A 3 "globalAngle\(" 

# Check the implementation of globalAngle to understand the precision requirements
ast-grep --pattern 'globalAngle($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1623

Copy link

📊: Physics performance monitoring for db6f652

Full contents

physmon summary

@paulgessinger paulgessinger modified the milestones: next, v39.0.0 Nov 29, 2024
@andiwand
Copy link
Contributor

andiwand commented Dec 2, 2024

Note, I think that this code is unmonitored and unused. I also believe this is not breaking

@asalzburger
Copy link
Contributor

Note, I think that this code is unmonitored and unused. I also believe this is not breaking

WE could remove this then?

@AJPfleger
Copy link
Contributor Author

removal is fine for me, I will try :)

@AJPfleger
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed in favour of a full removal:

@AJPfleger AJPfleger closed this Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component - Fatras Affects the Fatras module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants