Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capitalizing 'Manager' because Block Manager is a proper noun #19375

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 1, 2020

Conversation

mapk
Copy link
Contributor

@mapk mapk commented Dec 31, 2019

Description

Similarly to "Block Editor", the "Block Manager" is a proper noun and should be capitalized.

How has this been tested?

Tested locally.

Screenshots

Screen Shot 2019-12-31 at 11 32 23 AM

Types of changes

Non-breaking changes.

Checklist:

  • My code is tested.
  • My code follows the WordPress code style.
  • My code follows the accessibility standards.
  • My code has proper inline documentation.
  • I've included developer documentation if appropriate.
  • I've updated all React Native files affected by any refactorings/renamings in this PR. .

@mapk mapk added General Interface Parts of the UI which don't fall neatly under other labels. [Type] Copy Issues or PRs that need copy editing assistance labels Dec 31, 2019
@mapk mapk requested a review from talldan as a code owner December 31, 2019 19:33
@mapk mapk self-assigned this Dec 31, 2019
@mapk mapk requested review from ajitbohra, nerrad and ntwb as code owners January 1, 2020 15:57
Copy link
Member

@mkaz mkaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, 👍

Note, I needed to update the e2e-test that used the label, you can see my commit for an example on how.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
General Interface Parts of the UI which don't fall neatly under other labels. [Type] Copy Issues or PRs that need copy editing assistance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants