-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tagging as AUX vs. VERB when a copula/aux serves as head of a clause #211
Comments
Copulas should be tagged as AUX. "Will" is usually an auxiliary but in the case of "do as they wilt" I'm not sure if it should be interpreted as a main verb. |
Thanks, here might be some cases that tag copulas as AUX, which made me confused. Word: "is"
In this case, a "do" after "will" might be omitted? |
Interesting. The VERB cases are "X is that Y" sentences, which are an exception to the usual rule that copulas are not heads ("Exception: If the predicative element in the equation is a clause, then the copula verb is treated as the head of the clause, with the following clause as a ccomp (to prevent that the head of the smaller clause gets two subjects)."). I assume the copula should be AUX and is only VERB due to a conversion error. "Be" verbs are not considered copulas in existential sentences IIRC. |
Right, one interpretation is "do as they will do", and another is "do as they will", with "will" meaning something like 'want' or 'choose'. |
Here are some more cases that tag AUX as VERB: Word: "did"
Word: "is"
Word: "is"
Commit: 2f5eba2 |
The last 2 are the same construction as "X is that Y" but "that" is omitted. |
Yes, it seems so. |
GUM does not implement this exception, which I think is a mistake, for several reasons. In "the problem is that Kim is tired", If we label the matrix clause copula as
I can add to these considerations for English that in languages with zero copula constructions, the analysis of the copula as
In this case, there is no possibility of applying the exceptional analysis, and we get two |
I understand, but the tag should be AUX regardless of the dependency structure, right? |
I don't know how to answer that exactly, since I don't agree with the exceptional dependency structure... I suppose if we were to say it's root then it would be right for it to be VERB, since and AUX has to be a kind of aux/cop/etc. to something else (i.e. AUX is a relationally defined category). But essentially, I don't accept the premise here, so I can't give an unbiased answer regarding the POS... |
…ression "do what thou wilt"; historically "wilt" was 2nd person singular) (#211)
Sentences like "X is that Y" now have multiple subjects with the first one attaching as There are still >100 instances of "be" as VERB rather than AUX without existential "there". I think most of these are copulas (in various constructions: ellipsis etc.) and should be revised. http://universal.grew.fr/?custom=638e0f72dd8f8 |
Hi, the followings are the suspicious cases that tag VERB as AUX.
Word: "wilt" (Duplicate Items)
Word: "are"
Word: "is"
Word: "was"
Commit: 2f5eba2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: