-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add status attribute to statistics for review v. published #76
Comments
@USGSPMM3 are we only expecting to need review v. published for gage statistics and characteristics (I'm thinking essentially a true/false)? Or will we need more, like in NSS, where there's Review, Disabled, NSS Approved, SS Approved, etc.? I think I'll also work in a step that checks for a citation and marks it as in review if there is none. |
@kjacobsen16 I am going to send an email to Ryan and cc you. |
This should be on each statistic and will use the Status table used for the NSS regression regions. We should also add the "DateStatusModified" table and associated trigger to keep that updated. |
@USGSPMM3 something we didn't clarify on the call - is this wanted for statistics and characteristics? Or just statistics? Once we have the process nailed down for statistics, adding it to the characteristics should be trivial. |
☝️ from Pete, also added it to USGS-WiM/NSS#452, might be more of a client-side task? |
@amedenblik this is a good second issue for you! This requires DB work so will need a migration, which I will send more info on later. So the tasks at hand:
Edit: (KJ noticed before leaving) I also noted above that Pete was hoping to mark things automatically as review if there isn't a citation attached, and we should add a trigger for "date status modified", just like the regression regions have |
Think about: do we just want simple ready v. not ready for production? Or use the statuses we already have for the regression regions?
If just ready v. not ready for production, would checking for citation be enough?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: