Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom tribes as "tags" #208

Closed
chmac opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Custom tribes as "tags" #208

chmac opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@chmac
Copy link
Member

chmac commented Apr 1, 2015

@simison and I have been brainstorming.

  • Users can add tags to their profile.
  • Tags that have >150 members become tribes.
  • We'll start with a curated list of <10 tags.
  • Our initial list will automatically be promoted to tribes.
  • Initially, users can manually tag themselves.
  • In the future, we will auto suggest tags to people based on crawling their existing social graph.
  • Auto suggested tags will (probably?) be added to a user's profile automatically as some sort of "low-level" invisible tags. Show them as suggestions to the profile owner and allow removing them.
  • Tags can be used as a factor to calculate compatibility between members. Idea: Compatibility scores #207
  • When viewing a user's profile, matching tags can be visually highlighted as a crude indicator of compatibility.

It might be possible for users to only accept requests from members of certain "tribes". (For example, I only accept vegan guests, geek guests, etc.) This needs to be figured out in more detail.

@guaka
Copy link
Contributor

guaka commented Apr 1, 2015

Yes!

  • tags can be made equivalent if enough (trusted) people agree. e.g. hitchhiker - hitchhiking - hitching
  • let people use hashtags in places such as their profile and references

@chmac
Copy link
Member Author

chmac commented Apr 1, 2015

One topic we discussed was human intervention. I'm of the opinion that human intervention is only required if users are able to enter free text. If they're not (in a trust / reference setting), then we may not have a need for human intervention. Human intervention is (in my opinion) extremely hard to get right, without ending up with a small number of people wielding a lot of power in secret.

@almorsen
Copy link

almorsen commented Apr 1, 2015

hi
i like the idea of tags...
it could work same way that i used to use the groups in Cs for filtering, looking for people in the same groups i was...

so having those tags and being able to filter for users that haver got tgs in common with you would be very usefull when the number of users goes on growing up.

@guaka
Copy link
Contributor

guaka commented Apr 2, 2015

brainstorm with @chmac and @simison

hitchwiki referal: add hitchhiker tag automatically (same for trashwiki, veganwiki)

initial tribes, to be rendered precise/clear

  • hitchhiker
  • tech/geek/hacker (tbd)
  • vegan/vegetarian
  • parents and family
  • dumpster diver
  • musician (added later, thanks @almorsen)

people can add tags that we store and use later on
once 1k people have added their own tags we can get an idea of what to add next or open up, probably 150 people using a tag is a good indication, and we should keep an eye on synonyms

@chmac
Copy link
Member Author

chmac commented Apr 2, 2015

Users can add whatever tags they want, but we automatically display a curated list of 5-10 "suggested" tribes.

@almorsen
Copy link

almorsen commented Apr 3, 2015

What about a tribe musicians?
El 2/4/2015 19:08, "Callum Macdonald" [email protected] escribió:

Users can add whatever tags they want, but we automatically display a
curated list of 5-10 "suggested" tribes.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#208 (comment)
.

@guaka guaka modified the milestones: Summer solstice, equinox Apr 5, 2015
@simison simison changed the title Idea: Tags and tribes Tags and tribes Jun 1, 2015
@simison simison self-assigned this Mar 23, 2016
@simison simison modified the milestones: next up, soonish Mar 23, 2016
simison added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2016
At database level everything is basically "tags", and "tribes" are essentially just tags on steroids.
They're promoted from tags by setting `tribe:true`. At initial phase, we will have fixed number of
tags which are all promoted to be Tribes right away. Eventually users will be able to create their own
tags and enough of members per tag will create a tribe out of it.
Also search functionaility around tribes is still missing.

Purpose of this initial feature set is to help promoting TR to new
audiences beyond our initial hitchhikers community.
simison added a commit that referenced this issue May 4, 2016
At database level everything is basically "tags", and "tribes" are essentially just tags on steroids.
They're promoted from tags by setting `tribe:true`. At initial phase, we will have fixed number of
tags which are all promoted to be Tribes right away. Eventually users will be able to create their own
tags and enough of members per tag will create a tribe out of it.
Also search functionaility around tribes is still missing.

Purpose of this initial feature set is to help promoting TR to new
audiences beyond our initial hitchhikers community.
@simison simison changed the title Tags and tribes Custom tribes as "tags" Oct 16, 2018
@simison simison mentioned this issue Oct 16, 2018
@simison simison removed this from the next up milestone Oct 16, 2018
@guaka guaka added the trust label Oct 16, 2018
@simison simison mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2018
9 tasks
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is marked as unloved because it has not had any activity for 180 days.

It doesn't mean it's not important, so please remove the unloved label if you like it, or add a comment saying what it means to you :) If this was a bug, maybe you can test to see if this is still an issue?

However, if you just leave it like this, I'll close it in 14 days to help keep your issues tidy!

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants