Do not assign drainage basins to invalid pixels #161
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a problem with drainage basins which would lead to pixels that are not part of the flow network such as NaNs in the DEM being assigned to their own drainage basin.
The problem was that sinks, outlets and invalid pixels are all assigned placeholder edges by
flow_routing_d8_carve
that point from them to -1. We were using this placeholder edge to detect when to create a new drainage basin. This works for the sinks and outlets, but also creates a drainage basin for the invalid pixels. This PR switches this behavior to 1. skip these placeholder edges and 2. test whether the target pixel has not yet been assigned to a drainage basin. This matches the behavior of the MATLAB implementation, leaving invalid pixels with a 0 label for their drainage basin.This is part of some changes I am planning to the representation of flow networks in libtopotoolbox that should eventually remove those placeholder edges.