Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CI to test against the TileDB core library built from source with a custom version #2091

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

dudoslav
Copy link
Collaborator

@dudoslav dudoslav commented Oct 15, 2024

There are several PRs that we need to test against a branch of libtiledb, most commonly the dev branch, as they implement features/fixes we want to test before the release of the libtiledb binaries.

This PR implements a workflow to test against the TileDB core library built from source using a custom version.


[sc-57260]

@dudoslav dudoslav requested a review from kounelisagis October 15, 2024 11:26
@dudoslav dudoslav self-assigned this Oct 15, 2024
dudoslav and others added 3 commits October 15, 2024 13:27
It doesn't make much sense because we will have failing jobs while libtiledb development is ongoing. We only want it for specific PRs.
@kounelisagis
Copy link
Member

I removed the pull_request trigger. As I wrote in the commit description, it doesn't make much sense because we will have failing jobs while libtiledb development is ongoing. We only want it for specific PRs.

@kounelisagis kounelisagis changed the title Add CI that tests PRs agains TileDB core library Add CI to test against the TileDB core library built from source with a custom version Oct 15, 2024
@kounelisagis kounelisagis merged commit b29e61d into dev Oct 16, 2024
15 checks passed
@kounelisagis kounelisagis deleted the db/sc-57260/source branch October 16, 2024 08:44
kounelisagis added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants