-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Request]sonarr v3 package #3443
Comments
OK, noticed. |
I can take a look, once it is released for stable. |
A beta package would be nice for the time being |
Any updates about sonarr v3 ? The beta seems to be really interesting |
when it will be available on synology packages |
Hey @Safihre any chance a beta package can be released like SynoCommunity has done for the "Custom" packages that let you run a fork of your choice? Thanks for you hard work. |
So, it looks like some changes were made for v3 compatibility to the service-setup.sh script through commit 117650e. So, does this mean that v3 is now supported? |
Any update on this yet? |
Would really love to try this, any ETA on support? |
Same here. It would be great to have a v3 package to test at minimum. |
Me three |
The test-releases can be downloaded here: I've only uploaded the packages, in case of problems please report them at #3803 so @maxrogers can look at them 👍 |
Thanks Safihre! |
Thanks for making this available. I don't see an Avoton build, however. Is there a build I can use for a DS1815+? |
@simonwestenholz: According to Safihre's post you can use the general x64 testing package. |
I’ve installed this and trying to updated it using the Internet updater, but that seems to be failing (to 20200107-mumble) |
@LwsBtlr You need to be a bit more specific. Did you check the logs why it fails? |
I reinstalled it and then it updated properly. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ |
@Safihre any chance for a 88f6282 package? |
Updated to 3.0.3-688 fine, if that is what you’re asking. |
@Stanzilla try the 88f6281 package, it's the same architecture so should work I think. |
Hrm, package failed to start, will try getting logs later |
alright, restart fixed it! |
@Stanzilla yes I have Mono 5.20 ready, but am waiting for #3852 to be merged. |
@hgy59 got a link to a test version or would you advise to not install it on a production system yet? |
Hrm not sure why but it suddenly broke:
Interesting, the files are just gone, probably something gone wrong during self-update? |
@Stanzilla odd, do you have any more info? Sonarr logs? Did this happen after you ran a Sonarr update? Had you run an update previously? |
Did not really touch it after installing updates, logs attached! |
@Stanzilla It seems that it failed while updating because
Let me think about this more to try to figure out what might have happened. Look in /tmp/sonarr_update/ to see what you find there and maybe give us the output of Interestingly, I see a successful update in your prior logs here:
|
@maxrogers I updated via DSM and it updated quite quickly. Must be related to DB size as I do not have a huge library in Sonarr |
Seems like it. I have a database with over 23k episodes in it and had the same results as @maxrogers had above. It seems to be working fine now but it was a very confusing process. |
Unsure where you found out how many episodes you have, however I only have 78 series in Sonarr and some of them have minimal seasons/episodes. |
@maxrogers Updated the package in the link. |
I installed the initial v3x package from here and have been updating via the built-in Sonarr updater since. I'm now running v3.0.3.754 which came out yesterday. I have an update notice in DSM. It's v20200409-16. What Sonarr version does v20200409-16 map to? Edit: I think the description should be updated to "Updated Sonarr to vX and add workaround for mono bug with armv5/88f6281". The previous package has the Sonarr version number. |
The v20200409-16 update in DSM is an update to the DSM package (wrapper). It will only upgrade the internal Sonarr executable if it contains a newer version of Sonarr than the one that you currently have installed. If you already have a newer version of the Sonarr installed then it will only upgrade the package (not Sonarr). In your case, since you are on v3, it will only upgrade the package. |
Thank you for the explanation. Upgraded Sonarr and Mono without any issues. |
@Safihre looks like your packages do not include the typo fix from #3865 (comment) |
Slightly off topic, but Sonarr v3 is so great... Does anybody here know if there's a Radarr v3 package for Synology available (or is anybody here willing to make one for testing)? I installed the Sonarr package from: #3803 |
I have a DS918+ so apollolake (x64) and am running DSM 6.2.3-25423. The general x64 builds are for 6.1. Is there a build I can install to get v3 of sonarr? Thanks |
The 6.1 ones should work just fine. |
Thanks @Safihre, V3 looks great! |
Nice work @Safihre Looking forward to seeing your build on SynoCommunity in due time! |
I am trying to update using your build, but I get an error that I can't downgrade. I have version 20200921-18 from SynoCommunity. How would I be able to update using your build? Thank you for any help. |
I'm having the exact same issue.... |
@sick-n-tired @Forts117 just take a manual backup, then uninstall the current package, install this build fresh and then restore your backup. this is what worked for me after seeing the same error. |
Any word on when Sonarr v3 will hit SynoCommunity? |
We kind of hoped they would finally release a stable version after so many years.. Then we can switch. Although if we knew it would take so many years, we would have made 2 versions at the beginning. |
Last night I just opted to bite the bullet and roll with an all Docker set up. |
@Safihre You have all permissions required to review, accept, merge, build and publish packages. |
@ymartin59 Just to be sure, we are not waiting anymore for V3 to become stable? |
My two cents
I have used v3 on a docker set up on my ds418play and it is rock solid
The tag and multi language features are awesome
Le 17 janv. 2021 à 10:20, Safihre <[email protected]> a écrit :
@ymartin59 <https://github.com/ymartin59> Just to be sure, we are not
waiting anymore for V3 to become stable?
Since the package is renamed , are we keeping the NzbDrone package in the
repo?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3443 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABTPZ3HOMTNNLFOUGUC5JA3S2KTWZANCNFSM4FTUVSKQ>
.
|
@Safihre No idea, I am not a Sonar user. Question is: do we expect users to move "smoothly" from Sonar v2 to Sonar v3 without complex operation to keep their existing configuration/database ? if yes, we should either keep package name as is (and confirm v3 is able to upgrade config/database from v2), or provide a wizard/tooling in Sonar v3 to grab configuration/data from installed v2 on system... |
I think a smooth upgrade is ideal. I was able to use the package provided on here to smoothly upgrade to v3 without losing anything and any future v3 updates Sonarr puts out update no problem right from within the applications own updater without issues. |
@ymartin59 @Safihre I totally agree with moving to v3. FYI, I just updated the pull request with the latest version of Sonarr. We previously had a lot of users who upgraded successfully via this package (v2 -> v3 upgrade) and they reported here that it worked properly. The only issue was for people that have large databases the upgrade can time out via the Synology interface. However, it does still complete the upgrade properly. In addition, I previously tested this package thoroughly and it upgraded from v2 to v3 just great. I have been running it for ages now. That being said, it might be nice to have at least one person test the v2->v3 upgrade via this package because I added the updated sonarr v3.0.4.1091 (just to be sure that doesn't cause any upgrade issues). NOTE: It has a warning added requesting that users back up their data via Sonarr interface before performing the upgrade as a failsafe. |
@maxrogers I tried this weekend using nzbdrone_88f6281-6.1_20201116-19.spk for my ds211j. I installed the version of Mono 5.20.1.34-17 available in from synocommunity then the page mentioned above. The service would not start so looked at service-setup and noticed that the workaround that was created for arm5 has 88f8621 and 88f8622 listed in the if condition instead of 88f6281 and 88f6281. After making these modifications i was able to get the service to start. Navigating through the menu i noticed things like fetch updates weren't working as mentioned in this thread by mk2k https://forums.sonarr.tv/t/synology-ds212j-sonarr-failed-to-run-package-service/26172/8 |
This was addressed in #3803 |
this maybe a bit early, i would like to request a sonarr v3 package for synology.
sonarr v3 will require a new package since it will not possible to update to v3 from the v2 webui.
it is possilbe to reuse the v2 database in v3.
more info can be found here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: