-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance Test Coverage for SPDF/Utils Classes #1385
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ProcessExecutorTest > testRunCommandWithOutputHandling_Error() FAILED |
|
I made one change on the test and I think it is ok now. |
szinn
referenced
this pull request
in szinn/k8s-homelab
Jun 9, 2024
…0.25.3 ) (#3802) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Update | Change | |---|---|---| | [ghcr.io/stirling-tools/s-pdf](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF) | patch | `0.25.2` -> `0.25.3` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF (ghcr.io/stirling-tools/s-pdf)</summary> ### [`v0.25.3`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/releases/tag/v0.25.3): 0.25.3 fix for version number not showing [Compare Source](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/compare/v0.25.2...v0.25.3) fix for version number not showing #### What's Changed - (Sonar) Fixed finding: "`@Override` should be used on overriding and implementing methods" by [@​pixeebot](https://github.com/pixeebot) in [https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/1396](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/1396) - (Sonar) Fixed finding: "Utility classes should not have public constructors" by [@​pixeebot](https://github.com/pixeebot) in [https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/1397](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/1397) - 💾 Update Version by [@​github-actions](https://github.com/github-actions) in [https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/1399](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/1399) - Enhance Test Coverage for SPDF/Utils Classes by [@​jimdouk](https://github.com/jimdouk) in [https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/1385](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/1385) **Full Changelog**: Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF@v0.25.2...v0.25.3 </details> <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy4zOTkuOCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM3LjM5OS44IiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJyZW5vdmF0ZS9jb250YWluZXIiLCJ0eXBlL3BhdGNoIl19--> Co-authored-by: repo-jeeves[bot] <106431701+repo-jeeves[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
My partner @foivospro and I created tests for the classes in the SPDF/utils file to increase the project's coverage rate. We did not create a new issue for this PR because we referenced the discussion, "The test coverage is pretty low. Is it in a separate repository? #1156."
Checklist:
Contributor License Agreement
By submitting this pull request, I acknowledge and agree that my contributions will be included in Stirling-PDF and that they can be relicensed in the future under the MPL 2.0 (Mozilla Public License Version 2.0) license.
(This does not change the general open-source nature of Stirling-PDF, simply moving from one license to another license)