S2589: Add FP repro for #8449

[mary-georgiou-sonarsource]

related to #8449

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[gregory-paidis-sonarsource]

Isn't this basically the same logic as this?

In the sense that a number is changing in the loop and we fail to track it more than N iterations?
If not, feel free to merge.

[mary-georgiou-sonarsource]

Isn't this basically the same logic as this?

In the sense that a number is changing in the loop and we fail to track it more than N iterations? If not, feel free to merge.

I feel the same too but I'd like also @Tim-Pohlmann opinion.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[Tim-Pohlmann]

@gregory-paidis-sonarsource @mary-georgiou-sonarsource in a sense and I considered recommending to close this as a duplicate. But since my SE experiment has special handling for ++ I'd like to keep this around as a separate issue.