Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve S3267: Make the message more explicit #8069

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2023

Conversation

sebastien-marichal
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sebastien-marichal sebastien-marichal force-pushed the sebastien/s3267-improve-message branch from ae1fda5 to 21973c0 Compare September 25, 2023 15:26
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Contributor

@antonioaversa antonioaversa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
I would change the title to Improve S3267..., because the change of message is not really an issue.

@sebastien-marichal sebastien-marichal changed the title Fix S3267: Make the message more explicit Improve S3267: Make the message more explicit Sep 29, 2023
@sebastien-marichal sebastien-marichal merged commit f98d73d into master Sep 29, 2023
@sebastien-marichal sebastien-marichal deleted the sebastien/s3267-improve-message branch September 29, 2023 08:10
@gregory-paidis-sonarsource gregory-paidis-sonarsource added this to the 9.12 milestone Oct 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants