fix home_path, local mini-agi run works

[SilenNaihin]

Background

Getting miniagi working locally
.env:

OPENAI_API_KEY=sk
MODEL="gpt-4"
SUMMARIZER_MODEL="gpt-3.5-turbo"
ENABLE_CRITIC=false
PROMPT_USER=false

MAX_CONTEXT_SIZE=4000
MAX_MEMORY_ITEM_SIZE=2000
SUMMARIZER_CHUNK_SIZE=3000

WORK_DIR=
DEBUG=false

PR Quality Checklist

• I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black .
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[ai-maintainer]

Review for PR: "fix home_path, local mini-agi run works"

Summary

The PR is focused and addresses a specific issue related to the home_path and making the local mini-agi run work. The changes are localized to specific files and are related to addressing the home_path and workspace directory creation.

Code Quality

The PR does not introduce any new functions, classes, or methods, so there are no missing docstrings. The PR Quality Checklist indicates that the code has been run through various linters, which is a good practice.

PR Description

The PR title and description provide a clear and concise explanation of the changes. The background information and the PR Quality Checklist in the description are helpful.

Testing

The PR description does not explicitly mention how the changes were tested. It would be beneficial to include information about the testing process in future PRs to provide a complete picture of the changes and their impact.

Recommendation

I recommend reaching out to the author for more details on the testing process. Other than that, the PR looks good and seems ready for merging, pending any additional testing information.

[dschonholtz]

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Fix home_path, local mini-agi run works

👍 Title and Description

The Title and description are clear, concise and helpful

The title and description of the pull request are clear and concise. They effectively communicate the purpose of the changes, which is to fix the home_path issue and ensure the local mini-agi run works. The PR Quality Checklist also indicates that the contributor has run various commands against the code to ensure it passes linters.

👍 Scope of Changes

The changes are narrowly focused

The changes in the pull request appear to be narrowly focused on fixing the home_path issue and ensuring that the local mini-agi run works. There are no indications that the author is trying to resolve multiple issues simultaneously. This focused approach is generally preferred as it allows for easier review and understanding of the changes being made.

❓ Testing

Testing details are not provided

The description of the pull request does not explicitly mention how the author tested the changes. While the description does not provide specific details about the testing process, it is possible that the author has tested the changes locally before submitting the pull request. It would be helpful to ask the author for more information about the testing process to ensure that the changes have been thoroughly tested.

👍 Docstrings

No new functions, classes, or methods added

Based on the provided diff, there are no newly added functions, classes, or methods. Therefore, there are no docstrings that need to be added.

👍 Code Quality

Code changes are appropriate and follow best practices

The changes made in the code are appropriate and follow best practices. The modification to the home_path and the run_agent function, as well as the modification to the config.json file, are all in line with the stated goal of the pull request.

Recommendations

Please provide more information about how you tested these changes. This will help ensure that the changes have been thoroughly tested and that they work as expected.

Thank you for your contribution!

---

@merwanehamadi Let me know what you think with respect to something like this