Update autogpt back to where it was

[waynehamadi]

Background

Changes

PR Quality Checklist

• I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black . --exclude test.py
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[github-actions]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring the naming of a variable in the 'send_to_googledrive.py' script
• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ✨ Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused as it only changes the name of a variable in a single file and the title and description align with this change.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No, the PR does not introduce any potential security issues as it only involves a variable name change.

PR Feedback

• 💡 General PR suggestions: The PR seems to be straightforward and follows the project's coding standards. However, it would be beneficial to add a brief explanation in the PR description about why this variable name change is necessary. This would provide more context for the reviewers and maintainers.

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."