sdl2-image: Add version 2.0.5

[g-berthiaume]

This PR add the SDL2_image library to scoop; addressing this issue.
SDL2_image is a complement to the already supported SDL2 library.

My thanks for the creators of the sdl2.json app manifest.
This PR was inspired from their work.

[rashil2000]

Autoupdate missing

Also, please add a newline at the end

[issaclin32]

I think this package should be in the main bucket.
Also, please rename the file to sdl2-image.json, following the pattern of existing packages.

[g-berthiaume]

I think this package should be in the main bucket.

I kinda agree.
That said, the SDL2 package is already in the Extra bucket.
I don't know what was the rationale for putting it there.

@r15ch13 has made the earliest commit on the sdl2.json file.
Maybe he/she would know.

[g-berthiaume]

Everything should be all right.
Not sure what to think about the Extra vs Main bucket.

[rashil2000]

The installer scripts are quite elaborate here, as opposed to the Main bucket's criteria. I think it should stay in Extras.

[rashil2000]

/verify

[rashil2000]

@niheaven wouldn't this require ScoopInstaller/Scoop#3518?

[issaclin32]

wouldn't this require ScoopInstaller/Scoop#3518?

Yes, you are right, but I think it is okay to use it now.

This will just cause autoupdate to fail (thus the package will not be updated before Scoop#3518 is in master.

We can choose not to add autoupdate this time, but we still need to update it manually. So it does not make any difference.

[issaclin32]

I kinda agree. That said, the SDL2 package is already in the Extra bucket. I don't know what was the rationale for putting it there.

This has to do with earlier criteria of the Main bucket. I think these criteria are abolished after late 2019, but some CLI packages still remain in the Extras bucket.

For an app to be acceptable for the main bucket, it should be:

A reasonably well-known and widely used developer tool
The latest stable version of the program
The full version i.e. not a trial version
A fairly standard install (e.g. uses a version-specific download URL, no elaborate pre/post install scripts)
A non-GUI tool

I tend to add the package to Extras for now. I think it is better to move all the CLI packages into Main, but this requires further discussion.

[niheaven]

I kinda agree. That said, the SDL2 package is already in the Extra bucket. I don't know what was the rationale for putting it there.

This has to do with earlier criteria of the Main bucket. I think these criteria are abolished after late 2019, but some CLI packages still remain in the Extras bucket.

For an app to be acceptable for the main bucket, it should be:

A reasonably well-known and widely used developer tool
The latest stable version of the program
The full version i.e. not a trial version
A fairly standard install (e.g. uses a version-specific download URL, no elaborate pre/post install scripts)
A non-GUI tool

I tend to add the package to Extras for now. I think it is better to move all the CLI packages into Main, but this requires further discussion.

Emm, lots of job 😄 But we can move whatever we meet.