Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add firewall warning for diskless SDB #229

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 6, 2022

Conversation

tahliar
Copy link
Collaborator

@tahliar tahliar commented Jun 30, 2022

Description

Added a warning about blocking cluster communication in the local firewall, especially for diskless SBD.

Backports

  • To maintenance/SLEHA15SP4
  • To maintenance/SLEHA15SP3
  • To maintenance/SLEHA15SP2
  • To maintenance/SLEHA15SP1
  • To maintenance/SLEHA15
  • To maintenance/SLEHA12SP5
  • To maintenance/SLEHA12SP4

References

DOCTEAM-659
BSC#1200331

For DOCTEAM-659
BSC#1200331
@tahliar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tahliar commented Jun 30, 2022

New warning:

diskless-sdb

Copy link
Contributor

@gao-yan gao-yan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for taking care, @tahliar!

Copy link
Contributor

@gao-yan gao-yan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for the revision, @tahliar !

<title>Do not block Corosync traffic in the local firewall</title>
<para>
Diskless SBD relies on reformed membership and loss of quorum to achieve
fencing. Corosync traffic must be able pass through all network interfaces,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, not a native speaker here, but should it be "be able to ..."?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, you're right. I must have read it so many times that I didn't notice the missing "to". Fixing now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gao-yan and @tahliar looks good to me. And initially I've misspelled in the comment.

@tahliar tahliar merged commit ef7cf93 into main Jul 6, 2022
@tahliar tahliar deleted the DOCTEAM-659-diskless-sdb-firewall-warning branch July 6, 2022 00:06
tahliar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2022
* Add firewall warning for diskless SDB

For DOCTEAM-659
BSC#1200331

* Improve diskless SDB fencing warning

* Clarify diskless SDB fencing warning

* Add missing word
tahliar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2022
* Add firewall warning for diskless SDB

For DOCTEAM-659
BSC#1200331

* Improve diskless SDB fencing warning

* Clarify diskless SDB fencing warning

* Add missing word
tahliar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2022
* Add firewall warning for diskless SDB

For DOCTEAM-659
BSC#1200331

* Improve diskless SDB fencing warning

* Clarify diskless SDB fencing warning

* Add missing word
tahliar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2022
* Add firewall warning for diskless SDB

For DOCTEAM-659
BSC#1200331

* Improve diskless SDB fencing warning

* Clarify diskless SDB fencing warning

* Add missing word
tahliar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2022
* Add firewall warning for diskless SDB

For DOCTEAM-659
BSC#1200331

* Improve diskless SDB fencing warning

* Clarify diskless SDB fencing warning

* Add missing word
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants