Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we switch back to http as standard HttpType? #477

Closed
svenoe opened this issue Sep 26, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Should we switch back to http as standard HttpType? #477

svenoe opened this issue Sep 26, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@svenoe
Copy link
Contributor

svenoe commented Sep 26, 2020

Using OTOBO via the "wrong" http type has some consequences, which are very hard to see through when you don't know what you are doing. As the switch to https usually is done with more awareness, it might be good, to use http as standard type again, or in the longer run ask in the installer or so.

See Issue #475 as an example (and my explanation in the last messages there).

@svenoe svenoe added the question Further information is requested label Sep 26, 2020
@StefanRother-OTOBO
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I don´t like the idea going back to "http", cause I had the same problem in another tool, and I need a lot time to find the setting...:) .
I think the best idea is to ask the information inside the installer process.
That's not really difficult and after that we are save.

What do you think?

Stefan

@svenoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

svenoe commented Sep 28, 2020

Yes, probably good.

@svenoe svenoe closed this as completed Sep 28, 2020
@bschmalhofer
Copy link
Contributor

Perhaps this can be combined with the setting for FQDN. Maybe have a single setting for "URL used by Agents".

@StefanRother-OTOBO
Copy link
Contributor

I spoke with @bschmalhofer and we think ewe do not need "URL used by Agents".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants