Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency Roslynator.Analyzers to v4.1.0 #483

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 29, 2022

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
Roslynator.Analyzers nuget minor 4.0.2 -> 4.1.0

Release Notes

JosefPihrt/Roslynator

v4.1.0

  • Add analyzer RCS1254 (Normalize format of enum flag value)
  • Add analyzer RCS1253 (Format documentation comment summary)
  • Add analyzer RCS1252 (Normalize usage of infinite loop)
  • Add analyzer RCS1251 (Remove unnecessary braces from record declaration)
  • Add refactoring Deconstruct foreach variable (RR0217)
  • Add code fix for CS8602, CS8604
  • Add suggestion to call AddRange instead of Add (RCS1235)
  • Put back refactoring "Split local declaration and assignment" (RR0194) (issue)
  • Adopt activation events in VS Code extension (issue) (thanks to ProphetLamb)
  • Fix: Get config value from global AnalyzerConfig if available (issue)
  • Fix: Do not suggest using null-forgiving operator for parameter default value (CS8625)
  • Fix: Check if equality operator is overloaded (RCS1171)
  • Fix: Do not remove field initialization in struct with constructor(s) (RCS1129)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🚚 private-dependencies Private dependency
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant