Fix facility code and card number checking in LF HID Brute

[Donny-Guo]

In lf hid brute command, there's a checking on the range of facility code and card number to determine when it should stop. The original code (card_hi.FacilityCode < 0xFF and card_hi.CardNumber < 0xFFFF) does not account for different card formats.

Fix it by pulling the corresponding card format limit from FormatTable.

[github-actions]

You are welcome to add an entry to the CHANGELOG.md as well

[iceman1001]

1. Don't remove a section code without any comment. I don't think you meant to.
2. This solution feels wrong. Where I agree that the format in use should need a better struct, I don't see adding the extra struct meaningful. It can easily be added to the first struct. I would use names like "MaxFC", "MaxCN", etc.
3. This should then be modified in all the unpack and pack functions. And other places where code like this is being used.

[Donny-Guo]

1. I am really sorry for my silly mistake and the missing code is recovered.
2. I've removed the new struct and add variables to the first struct.
3. There's no changes to all pack and unpack functions for now since both FormatTable and pack/unpack functions are all static and I could not find a way to do such modification without making big changes. I am considering changing all pack/unpack functions to non-static but I am not sure how this will affect the proxmark image size or anything else. Any suggestions?

[iceman1001]

Now its a better solution.

When I mentioned pack/unpack functions it has nothing to do with being static or not.
It has to do with the checks that are inside each function. They should get its designated format from the table of formats and then implement range checks accordingly. You follow me?

static bool Pack_Tecom27(wiegand_card_t *card, wiegand_message_t *packed, bool preamble) {
    memset(packed, 0, sizeof(wiegand_message_t));

    if (card->FacilityCode > 0x7FF) return false; // Can't encode FC.
    if (card->CardNumber > 0xFFFF) return false; // Can't encode CN.
    if (card->IssueLevel > 0) return false; // Not used in this format
    if (card->OEM > 0) return false; // Not used in this format

[Donny-Guo]

Yes, I got it. Thanks again @iceman1001. I created a PR for updating the range checking.