Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial Debezium Outbox support #1167

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

mjholder
Copy link
Contributor

Link(s) to Jira

Description of Intent of Change(s)

The what, why and how.
This adds a new outbox model for debezium to read. It also adds a new debezium connector template to pickup changes in the outbox.

Local Testing

How can the feature be exercised?
How can the bug be exploited and fix confirmed?
Is any special local setup required?

Checklist

  • if API spec changes are required, is the spec updated?
  • are there any pre/post merge actions required? if so, document here.
  • are theses changes covered by unit tests?
  • if warranted, are documentation changes accounted for?
  • does this require migration changes?
    • if yes, are they backwards compatible?
  • is there known, direct impact to dependent teams/components?
    • if yes, how will this be handled?

Secure Coding Practices Checklist Link

Secure Coding Practices Checklist

  • Input Validation
  • Output Encoding
  • Authentication and Password Management
  • Session Management
  • Access Control
  • Cryptographic Practices
  • Error Handling and Logging
  • Data Protection
  • Communication Security
  • System Configuration
  • Database Security
  • File Management
  • Memory Management
  • General Coding Practices

@mjholder mjholder marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2024 14:45
@lpichler
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@lpichler
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@lpichler
Copy link
Contributor

@mjholder maybe can you do rebase ? not sure why CI is failing.

@lpichler
Copy link
Contributor

@mjholder if CI failure is related to connector, can outbox table/model be done in separate PR? 🙏

@mjholder
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mjholder if CI failure is related to connector, can outbox table/model be done in separate PR? 🙏

Weird. I'll put it in a separate pr

@mjholder
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@lpichler
Copy link
Contributor

@lpichler lpichler merged commit 6c1fcbd into RedHatInsights:master Aug 28, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants