We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With the discussion around issue #40, in IRC @joernhees suggested that we could adopt the same workflow than rdflib core uses:
-dev
That's http://semver.org conform and all the package management tools will see the "-something" as "pre-release".
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
i obviously like it ;)
In [24]: import pip In [25]: SemVer = pip.util.version.SemanticVersion In [26]: SemVer('1.6.3') < SemVer('1.6.4-dev') < SemVer('1.6.4') Out[26]: True
Sorry, something went wrong.
switched to 1.6.4-dev version (issue #43)
448667c
Then we can play with such naming in the following versions.
Thanks @joernhees for the valuable idea.
;) 👍
wikier
No branches or pull requests
With the discussion around issue #40, in IRC @joernhees suggested that we could adopt the same workflow than rdflib core uses:
-dev
That's http://semver.org conform and all the package management tools will see the "-something" as "pre-release".
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: