Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorganization of the InterPro Scan Search results section #688

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

apolignano
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@apolignano apolignano changed the title Reorganization interpro scan Reorganization of the InterPro Scan Search results section Jan 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@matthiasblum matthiasblum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, it looks very nice.

Here are a few things to fix:

  • tooltips should include the InterPro accession for integrated signatures, like the domain viewer for protein pages.
  • the short name of InterPro entries and member database signatures are not displayed in the table (in the "Entries" tab)

Also, it would be nice to simply hide the "Unintegrated" section (not even show the title) if there are no tracks inside.

Finally, while it's not that important and not in the scope of this PR, I noticed there is a trailing zero below the sequence in the "Sequence" tab (see screenshot). Can you check where it's coming from and delete it?

image

Copy link
Contributor

@matthiasblum matthiasblum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Feel free to merge, then open a PR for dev -> master.

@apolignano apolignano merged commit f3bc74e into dev Feb 3, 2025
3 checks passed
@matthiasblum matthiasblum deleted the reorganization_interpro_scan branch February 7, 2025 10:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants