Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix The Adorned not applying to jewels in outer tree sockets #7086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

LocalIdentity
Copy link
Contributor

The check for if the jewel came from the tree was coupled to the check to see if it was an expansion jewel so it didn't stop the jewel applying to Abyssal sockets on gear
The only way I could see to get the jewel to apply to outer tree sockets was to make sure it didn't have a parent attribute in the expansionJewel attribute
Fixes #7079

The check for if the jewel came from the tree was coupled to the check to see if it was an expansion jewel so it didn't stop the jewel applying to Abyssal sockets on gear
The only way I could see to get the jewel to apply to outer tree sockets was to make sure it didn't have a parent attribute in the expansionJewel attribute
@LocalIdentity LocalIdentity added the bug: behaviour Behavioral differences label Dec 18, 2023
@Wires77
Copy link
Member

Wires77 commented Dec 18, 2023

Did you test this on medium cluster jewel sockets?

@LocalIdentity
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Wires77 I tested it on all sockets on Medium, large and Voices

@LocalIdentity LocalIdentity merged commit 6aa25a1 into dev Dec 18, 2023
@LocalIdentity LocalIdentity deleted the fix_the-adorned branch December 18, 2023 20:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug: behaviour Behavioral differences
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The Adorned socket types (abyss)
2 participants